Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <30033f5b-3fd1-22c7-896b-af034a4041df@kapsi.fi>
Date:   Tue, 22 Feb 2022 10:27:03 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.4.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] drm/tegra: vic: Implement get_streamid_offset
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
        Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>,
        thierry.reding@gmail.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, joro@8bytes.org,
        will@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com
Cc:     linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
References: <20220218113952.3077606-1-mperttunen@nvidia.com>
 <20220218113952.3077606-9-mperttunen@nvidia.com>
 <b1df816b-6838-c435-1a23-5029144e4cfe@gmail.com>
 <7f4e4c47-59f1-1def-36bf-a2ded912f76d@gmail.com>
 <5d1b6e82-2c9d-8388-697f-0d7305a1206f@kapsi.fi>
 <ee648994-b296-2ac4-a676-ddcac463a428@gmail.com>
From:   Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@kapsi.fi>
In-Reply-To: <ee648994-b296-2ac4-a676-ddcac463a428@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2/21/22 22:10, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 21.02.2022 14:44, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
>> On 2/19/22 20:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> 19.02.2022 21:49, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>>>> 18.02.2022 14:39, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
>>>>> +static int vic_get_streamid_offset(struct tegra_drm_client *client)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +    struct vic *vic = to_vic(client);
>>>>> +    int err;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    err = vic_load_firmware(vic);
>>>>
>>>> You can't invoke vic_load_firmware() while RPM is suspended. Either
>>>> replace this with RPM get/put or do something else.
>>
>> Why not, I'm not seeing any HW accesses in vic_load_firmware? Although
>> it looks like it might race with the vic_load_firmware call in
>> vic_runtime_resume which probably needs to be fixed.
> 
> It was not clear from the function's name that h/w is untouched, I read
> "load" as "upload" and then looked at vic_runtime_resume(). I'd rename
> vic_load_firmware() to vic_prepare_firmware_image().
> 
> And yes, technically lock is needed.

Yep, I'll consider renaming it.

Mikko