Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:54:34 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
        slade@sladewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/196] 5.15.25-rc1 review
Message-ID: <YhSkypbAQUq5t5K7@kroah.com>
References: <20220221084930.872957717@linuxfoundation.org>
 <d72c8af1-e93d-44ae-15e0-737302523961@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d72c8af1-e93d-44ae-15e0-737302523961@roeck-us.net>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 09:15:52AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/21/22 00:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.25 release.
> > There are 196 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:48:58 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> 
> Building arm:allmodconfig ... failed
> Building arm64:allmodconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> drivers/tee/optee/core.c: In function 'optee_probe':
> drivers/tee/optee/core.c:726:20: error: operation on 'rc' may be undefined

I'm going to drop the tee patches in 5.10 and 5.15 for now.

thanks,

> 
> Building mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> net/netfilter/xt_socket.c: In function 'socket_mt_destroy':
> net/netfilter/xt_socket.c:224:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'nf_defrag_ipv6_disable'; did you mean 'nf_defrag_ipv4_disable'?

I'll go drop this one from everywhere as well, until it gets
straightened out upstream.

thanks,

greg k-h