Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 22 Feb 2022 15:15:47 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
        rafael@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, nm@ti.com,
        sboyd@kernel.org, mka@chromium.org, dianders@chromium.org,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: power: add Energy Model bindings
Message-ID: <20220222094547.tgj4bciq6rez62nk@vireshk-i7>
References: <20220221225131.15836-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
 <20220221225131.15836-2-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
 <20220222030337.ijnfrh367illmidr@vireshk-i7>
 <147e48e5-e310-cd8f-ba8c-ff32e3094be3@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <147e48e5-e310-cd8f-ba8c-ff32e3094be3@arm.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 22-02-22, 08:06, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> I'm not sure if that would be flexible enough to meet the requirement:
> power for each OPP might be different in one board vs. other board.

Don't DT files overload values from board files all the time ? Why wouldn't the
same apply for OPP table as well ?

> AFAIK the OPP definition is more SoC specific.

This isn't about OPP definition as well, but just that if DT allows you to
override or not. I think it will.

-- 
viresh