Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 22 Feb 2022 12:30:58 +0000
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/196] 5.15.25-rc1 review
Message-ID: <YhTXgiBmJqO1uh60@debian>
References: <20220221084930.872957717@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220221084930.872957717@linuxfoundation.org>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Greg,

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 09:47:12AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.25 release.
> There are 196 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:48:58 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 62 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 100 configs -> 1 new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 3 configs -> 1 new failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 4 configs -> no failure

Both arm and arm64 failed with the error:
drivers/tee/optee/core.c: In function 'optee_probe':
drivers/tee/optee/core.c:726:20: error: operation on 'rc' may be undefined [-Werror=sequence-point]
  726 |                 rc = rc = PTR_ERR(ctx);

Caused by: d7151f4ed49b ("optee: use driver internal tee_context for some rpc")

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/794
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/800
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/802

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip