X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:5802:b0:1b8:b737:a62b with SMTP id h2-20020a17090a580200b001b8b737a62bmr5009480pji.123.1645547204078; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:26:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1645547204; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wNTpSoANpt6LU57PlyYi00OM60uR1oFnmiRVgU5SjKGh304m7kg+evkXsVXo+gd3ke CzzYSLVNm2OT3PTymU0yoCWa0s5qXe+b68iOZzqG1FF+Ywt4bSKKqLR2c0BzpwnAYrKR opYyvPzjOy/EzzzOR/XDsgnh2pZvnz13FHAwYvtwnoylH9L+90eQBrGzQqPpBXhCScfq dz2zXDBL7sb8jpxENtL4pVkxFjBQoSTVtG9Ijo25c8HKc7+SbAKHFnujieMy43ug+wjK zJ6qfNnID7znhIa1Rz3D7ZLthieKtKpup3MifoZyx8BlIV1iz9Stk1EP5Ke/X3SUAUOx Iq6w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=59IWqIPR7DyNhvVYcSh2MO8t2xCzrLhbDj1GXNKOOPY=; b=GZyejygfhHefqmuBSWtpsK3VgXTI6X/TaU67np4DS5vIwFUf+3v+U/TZf4nA7WocrB 3huY3hyBv/zdK2VWOsbdDDvwkXiNoyEtf/MXeVM+hMdXBC9sKxWi18gYUIJl2mH1qs5c JbGGRyPZzuI5vWMAbae9VExEteNeum/xEjvyl9JEz4As/JMO9KM6b+Y559vStWljkFLZ vcvcAdNOCjQzg3d6kxAn15FatFb03JhW/QdBmc2OXQ/R2Yi3Z6uFArUL3nu/oC6RtTZZ x06CBR1kmbGrpL9Z5wjZtywxO6DEKWB8QKH8FbvPZLvKlpiG6Sku1U8LyZUnfbDs5nEG vJ0w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t14si22541368pgs.469.2022.02.22.08.26.28; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:26:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233639AbiBVPgX (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 22 Feb 2022 10:36:23 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44718 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233567AbiBVPgA (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2022 10:36:00 -0500 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz (jabberwock.ucw.cz [46.255.230.98]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89962163D6B; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 07:35:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id E4ACF1C0B85; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 16:35:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 16:35:28 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , syzbot , Jay Vosburgh , Veaceslav Falico , "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 29/58] bonding: fix data-races around agg_select_timer Message-ID: <20220222153528.GA27262@amd> References: <20220221084911.895146879@linuxfoundation.org> <20220221084912.825972694@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220221084912.825972694@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > syzbot reported that two threads might write over agg_select_timer > at the same time. Make agg_select_timer atomic to fix the races. Ok, but: > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c > @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static inline int __check_agg_selection_ > if (bond =3D=3D NULL) > return 0; > =20 > - return BOND_AD_INFO(bond).agg_select_timer ? 1 : 0; > + return atomic_read(&BOND_AD_INFO(bond).agg_select_timer) ? 1 : 0; > } This could probably use !!. > +static bool bond_agg_timer_advance(struct bonding *bond) > +{ > + int val, nval; > + > + while (1) { > + val =3D atomic_read(&BOND_AD_INFO(bond).agg_select_timer); > + if (!val) > + return false; > + nval =3D val - 1; > + if (atomic_cmpxchg(&BOND_AD_INFO(bond).agg_select_timer, > + val, nval) =3D=3D val) > + break; > + } > + return nval =3D=3D 0; > +} This should really be atomic_dec_if_positive, no? Best regards, Pavel --=20 http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAmIVAsAACgkQMOfwapXb+vKzngCeN5rpyiYQZre0h6CzYRc/yKs/ yFEAoK1I2ow3kXEy7OJt828WM82tSDEb =aXx+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z--