Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423437AbXBPJMM (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 04:12:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423438AbXBPJML (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 04:12:11 -0500 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:2726 "EHLO mail.muc.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423437AbXBPJMK (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 04:12:10 -0500 Date: 16 Feb 2007 10:12:07 +0100 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:12:07 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Chris Wright , Zachary Amsden Subject: Re: [patch 04/21] Xen-paravirt: =================================================================== Message-ID: <20070216091207.GA28196@muc.de> References: <20070216022449.739760547@goop.org> <20070216022530.755967483@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070216022530.755967483@goop.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 624 Lines: 17 Subject? description? On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 06:24:53PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > -static void vmi_set_pte_present(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte) > +static void vmi_set_pte_present(struct mm_struct *mm, u32 addr, pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte) And what good is that change anyways? unsigned long is the usual style for addresses. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/