Subject: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
From: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>
To: Scott Preece <sepreece@gmail.com>
Cc: Stuart MacDonald <stuartm@connecttech.com>, v j <vj.linux@gmail.com>,
       Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <7b69d1470702151636y243919c0n5307eaf7d20499c2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9b3a62ab0702142328h87365b6i932d4f2c117f7f0e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <000001c7511d$829e91c0$294b82ce@stuartm>
	 <7b69d1470702151636y243919c0n5307eaf7d20499c2@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:44:07 +0100
Message-Id: <1171619047.5835.110.camel@frg-rhel40-em64t-03>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 565
Lines: 16

On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 18:36 -0600, Scott Preece wrote:
> if the drivers are for devices
> proprietary to their hardware, then they have no real value to anyone
> else. And the drivers MIGHT contain information useful to their actual
> competitors.

Don't you feel like a contradiction in those two sentences ? :)

	Xav


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/