Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 23 Feb 2022 01:35:58 +0000
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To:     "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>, bhe@redhat.com,
        pmladek@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, anton@enomsg.org, ccross@android.com,
        dyoung@redhat.com, feng.tang@intel.com, john.ogness@linutronix.de,
        keescook@chromium.org, kernel@gpiccoli.net,
        kexec@lists.infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
        tony.luck@intel.com, vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] panic: Move panic_print before kmsg dumpers
Message-ID: <YhWPfqPlllm5XXHh@google.com>
References: <20220214141308.841525-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com>
 <YhRAOQbH15E7y9s8@google.com>
 <7702bdc2-78ce-00f5-d5a4-c06527c3ae72@igalia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7702bdc2-78ce-00f5-d5a4-c06527c3ae72@igalia.com>
Precedence: bulk

On (22/02/22 11:08), Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Hi Sergey, thanks for your feedback. So, personally I prefer having the
> flag - for me it's clear, it's just a matter of reading the prototype -
> either we print the info _or_ we console_flush.
> 
> But let's see if others have a preference - if the preference is to use
> the bitmask as you suggest, we can do it in a next version.

Sounds good to me, thanks.