Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1160999AbXBPOEd (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:04:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161001AbXBPOEd (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:04:33 -0500 Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:4323 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1160999AbXBPOEc (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:04:32 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:04:03 -0500 From: Neil Horman To: v j Cc: Trent Waddington , David Lang , Scott Preece , Miguel Ojeda , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers Message-ID: <20070216140403.GA20771@hmsreliant.homelinux.net> References: <20070215061149.GE15654@redhat.com> <9b3a62ab0702142227j19386132s870a0e745cfbb8d1@mail.gmail.com> <20070215165339.GB5285@thunk.org> <9b3a62ab0702151020k5bd0e4c9w763e1b01288ccc4f@mail.gmail.com> <653402b90702151102n3a3e0435r837e2191de79b2b@mail.gmail.com> <7b69d1470702151712x685f3e0eqf6198f9bb7f2394e@mail.gmail.com> <9b3a62ab0702152148p57db8b1dgd42b1c6fb15dccbb@mail.gmail.com> <3d57814d0702152157n461a9f0cta0a0c20e9a592d83@mail.gmail.com> <9b3a62ab0702152225m3893318by95cb8b260c74bfc2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9b3a62ab0702152225m3893318by95cb8b260c74bfc2@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2140 Lines: 49 On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:25:12PM -0800, v j wrote: > >It's written in black and white, in the license. > > Please point me to where it says I cannot load proprietary modules in > the Kernel. > It doesn't, but EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL makes it quite clear what you can not do if you are not a GPL module. > > Apart from that, > >Greg KH has made his opinion clear, and you have said you understand > >and don't debate that he holds this opinion, and his code is what you > >said you were linking to (the sysfs/class stuff), so why do you keep > >saying that "it is not clear". > > I know his opinion. I don't debate his opinion. It is his code. I > choose not to use his code because of the license issue. > Then choose not to use it and move on, rather than lamenting the fact that your life is more difficult because of his decision > >Do you think that, somehow, Linus' opinion trumps Greg KH's opinion on > >his own code? > > No, just that the trend is disturbing. If enough Kernel Developers > choose to write their Software in a way that prevents others from > using it freely, then that is troubling. Especially when these Kernel > Developers are substituting existing interfaces in the Kernel with > ones that are NEW and require specific licenses. > Its disturbing to you, and you alone. If you stopped using Linux today because of this, no one would miss you. If enough like-minded people did this, you would all be using your business model, and th F/OSS community would continue on its way. You appear to think that the community relies on people who make drivers in you're model, and thats simply not the case. Neil > vj. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/