Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964889AbXBPRAy (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:00:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964989AbXBPRAy (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:00:54 -0500 Received: from nic.NetDirect.CA ([216.16.235.2]:57410 "EHLO rubicon.netdirect.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964889AbXBPRAx (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:00:53 -0500 X-Originating-Ip: 74.109.98.130 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:58:57 -0500 (EST) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@CPE00045a9c397f-CM001225dbafb6 To: Richard Knutsson cc: Andreas Schwab , Vignesh Babu BM , Kernel Janitors List , linux-mm@kvack.org, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] is_power_of_2 in ia64mm In-Reply-To: <45D5D47F.3000303@student.ltu.se> Message-ID: References: <1171627435.6127.0.camel@wriver-t81fb058.linuxcoe> <45D5C789.1090607@student.ltu.se> <45D5D47F.3000303@student.ltu.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-16.8, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -15.00) X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-From: rpjday@mindspring.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1637 Lines: 45 On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Richard Knutsson wrote: > Andreas Schwab wrote: > > Richard Knutsson writes: > > > > > > > Vignesh Babu BM wrote: > > > > > > > @@ -175,7 +176,7 @@ static int __init hugetlb_setup_sz(char *str) > > > > tr_pages = 0x15557000UL; > > > > size = memparse(str, &str); > > > > - if (*str || (size & (size-1)) || !(tr_pages & size) || > > > > + if (*str || !is_power_of_2(size) || !(tr_pages & size) || > > > > size <= PAGE_SIZE || > > > > size >= (1UL << PAGE_SHIFT << MAX_ORDER)) { > > > > printk(KERN_WARNING "Invalid huge page size specified\n"); > > > > > > > > > > > As we talked about before; is this really correct? > > > !is_power_of_2(0) == true while (0 & (0-1)) == 0. > > > > size == 0 is also covered by the next two conditions, so the > > overall value does not change. > > > Yes, but is it meant to state that 'size' is not a power of two? > Otherwise, imho, it should be left as-is. i think the above change is fine. as long as the final, overall semantics of the condition are identical, then there's no problem. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/