Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Message-ID: <18bdf4ae-c445-ad10-b344-324436cbe445@canonical.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:09:39 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/4] mfd/pwm: dt-bindings: google, cros-ec:
 include generic pwm schema
Content-Language: en-US
To:     =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=c3=b6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc:     linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220214081916.162014-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
 <164557235424.1264579.14486504733557463529.b4-ty@sntech.de>
 <20220223062233.4m2xejozz4d47gmo@pengutronix.de>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220223062233.4m2xejozz4d47gmo@pengutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 23/02/2022 07:22, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:27:08AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:19:12 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> DTS patches are independent. Not tested, but I really hope no downstream kernel
>>> depends on pwm node naming... If it does, please change it to compatible. :)
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski (4):
>>>   dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: include generic pwm schema
>>>   arm64: dts: mt8183: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>>>   arm64: dts: qcom: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>>>   arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Applied, thanks!
>>
>> [4/4] arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>>       commit: 474a84be692d893f45a54b405dcbc137cbf77949
> 
> I expected that all patches in this series go in together via an ARM
> tree. Or are there expectations that this goes via PWM?

I would propose to pick individual patches by each maintainer. bindings
by PWM tree (Rob acked it) and DTS via each SoC tree.

Such approach gives flexibility, although `make dtbs_check` will spot
the new errors when run in PWM tree. Next will be fine, though.

Best regards,
Krzysztof