Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 12:04:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 12:03:59 -0500 Received: from zero.aec.at ([193.170.194.10]:34313 "EHLO zero.aec.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 12:03:47 -0500 To: ptb@it.uc3m.es Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Severe Linux 2.4 kernel memory leakage In-Reply-To: <1006699767.1178.0.camel@gandalf.chabotc.com> <200111251527.QAA05393@nbd.it.uc3m.es> From: Andi Kleen Date: 25 Nov 2001 18:03:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: "Peter T. Breuer"'s message of "Sun, 25 Nov 2001 16:30:13 +0100" Message-ID: Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070095 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.95) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Peter T. Breuer" writes: > "A month of sundays ago Chris Chabot wrote:" > > The box has ran Redhat 7.1 and 7.2, with plain vanilla linux kernels > > 2.4.9 upto 2.4.15, in all situations the same problem appeared. > > > > The problem is that when the box boots up, it uses about 60Mb of memory. > > However after only 1 1/2 days, the memory usage is already around 430Mb > > (!!). (this is ofcource used - buffers - cache, as displayed by 'free'). > > I also have this problem. Unknown circumstances provoke it. Kernel > 2.4.9 to 2.4.13. When it occurs I lose about 30MB a day. Compare snapshots of /proc/slabinfo before and after. It may be completely harmless; e.g. a slab cache. free is unfortunately quite misleading with newer kernels; it doesn't give information about many important caches (e.g. not about the slab caches) -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/