Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Uwe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kleine=2DK=F6nig?= 
        <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: include generic pwm schema
Date:   Wed, 23 Feb 2022 23:57:00 +0100
Message-ID: <3248917.W5uN0jUHDo@phil>
In-Reply-To: <YhX7UZSDaqNyD1rV@google.com>
References: <20220214081916.162014-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> <20220214081916.162014-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> <YhX7UZSDaqNyD1rV@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Lee,

Am Mittwoch, 23. Februar 2022, 10:16:01 CET schrieb Lee Jones:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> > Include generic pwm.yaml schema, which enforces PWM node naming.  Keep
> > the old name in bindings as deprecated.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml    | 4 ++++
> 
> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

what is your expectation regarding this patch?

Are you planning to merge it or are you expecting this to go through
some other tree?

The binding-change here is backward-comaptible in that the old
node-name is still in it, only marked as deprecated, so in theory
this patch should be able to be applied on its own without
causing defects.


Heiko

> 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/google,cros-ec-pwm.yaml          | 5 ++++-
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
>