Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:33:12 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc:     =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment_L=E9ger?= <clement.leger@bootlin.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/10] add support for fwnode in i2c mux system and sfp
Message-ID: <YhelOFYKBsfQ8SRW@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20220221162652.103834-1-clement.leger@bootlin.com>
 <20220224154040.2633a4e4@fixe.home>
 <2d3278ef-0126-7b93-319b-543b17bccdc2@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UFz+oQAxc4hNGIf3"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2d3278ef-0126-7b93-319b-543b17bccdc2@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk


--UFz+oQAxc4hNGIf3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 03:58:04PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:

> As Mark already mentioned the regulator subsystem has shown to
> be a bit problematic here, but you don't seem to need that?

I believe clocks are also potentially problematic for similar reasons
(ACPI wants to handle those as part of the device level power management
and/or should have native abstractions for them, and I think we also
have board file provisions that work well for them and are less error
prone than translating into an abstract data structure).

--UFz+oQAxc4hNGIf3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmIXpTcACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9C7rgf+KUcGclTVHJInHu1Lj3WFJRxMKM3KumT2C5IZueBQRnqjO6CJ/+nBQsKe
E25G8+ptCsa5iDNHDLl79Dr3oyV+pP0hVHYi4pWYIbnpyCf0gzj70ism86+RuD+g
NvC9ArDKBDyfMji4MXdQi7+HoWpudYGO6pfJSX4nngW8u4djH8nh0WvzyV/HX+Vl
WfW4J06a38ywZrPpoalaSj0cy4+uhTIkN7h7ZzlGGm0JgpKDxsnA5ZruABMNCqGU
gu63uQN68U7XJ4LE+2mgbu7P8iMBLoLhqClCuez1Ulk5KEL5YlNOsI9Zkhmb7WG3
6M3AJxCgE/PZnU/s9GSABYzlfmzLww==
=L3wN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UFz+oQAxc4hNGIf3--