Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     workflows@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        regressions@lists.linux.dev,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] docs: add two texts covering regressions
In-Reply-To: <cover.1644994117.git.linux@leemhuis.info>
References: <cover.1644994117.git.linux@leemhuis.info>
Date:   Thu, 24 Feb 2022 12:58:03 -0700
Message-ID: <871qzskpf8.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info> writes:

> "We don't cause regressions" might be the first rule of Linux kernel
> development, but it and other aspects of regressions nevertheless are hardly
> described in the Linux kernel's documentation. The following patches change
> this by creating two documents dedicated to the topic.
>
> The second patch could easily be folded into the first one, but was kept
> separate, as it might be a bit controversial. This also allows the patch
> description to explain some backgrounds for this part of the document.
> Additionally, ACKs and Reviewed-by tags can be collected separately this way.

Hearing no objections, I have applied this set, thanks.

jon