Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946355AbXBQBBx (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:01:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946352AbXBQBBx (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:01:53 -0500 Received: from smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.206]:39888 "HELO smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1946355AbXBQBBw (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:01:52 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=M5OdvutzJlwumKUKremzoLoRYxaO/0jI/o5SQJC6Nps4WGFKmO+NZ6VQXgh2xZ7xvcIuEJQo9d1YbHTURxKmfL414+H5c9DKsolWXyXihn7K27LKAD4znC3ZL8V07dutlePoDhryv17NjKFYmn99/oiNnC3YE4zGmv0YVJxlPxw= ; X-YMail-OSG: SlhnrHIVM1mOJSCkqTrR8qPxda7G4YYViCPzJHlPkiHDLRl6O4BISSThcE1mUxjNpmhp0e9jX2CAoUDv6EbS99SgBGa2mUpmqJdF2nBGs7v4qmoHZEf6i7C4UZCPuvlPwFJl1d0Xoxz7PuU- From: David Brownell To: Len Brown Subject: Re: loosen dependancy on rtc cmos Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:36:13 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel References: <20070214180915.GA6412@redhat.com> <200702152338.47151.lenb@kernel.org> <200702152112.08970.david-b@pacbell.net> In-Reply-To: <200702152112.08970.david-b@pacbell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702161636.13767.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1121 Lines: 27 On Thursday 15 February 2007 9:12 pm, David Brownell wrote: > On Thursday 15 February 2007 8:38 pm, Len Brown wrote: > > > So I've taken Andi's advice and checked in the patches below. > > OK; that simplifies things for me, good! I can discard that patch > (broken by Andi's pcspkr change anyway), stop worring about whether > most folk will even see that driver, and make time to look at the > ACPI hooks for RTC wakeup, instead. :) Which, by the way, means that folk with pre-ACPI systems aren't going to be able to use this driver until someone else provides an updated patch creating an "rtc_cmos" platform device. Or on the more modern end of things ... I suspect PCs using Linux-BIOS won't do PNPACPI either, and they will also need that platform device before using this driver. What do the MiniMac systems do? At one time I thought they were ACPI-free. - Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/