Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:02:26 -0600
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To:     Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= <pali@kernel.org>
Cc:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
        Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
        Marek =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beh=FAn?= <kabel@kernel.org>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/12] dt-bindings: PCI: mvebu: Add num-lanes property
Message-ID: <20220225000226.GA304258@bhelgaas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20220222155030.988-5-pali@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 04:50:22PM +0100, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> Controller driver needs to correctly configure PCIe link if it contains 1
> or 4 SerDes PCIe lanes. Therefore add a new 'num-lanes' DT property for
> mvebu PCIe controller. Property 'num-lanes' seems to be de-facto standard
> way how number of lanes is specified in other PCIe controllers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pali Roh?r <pali@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mvebu-pci.txt | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mvebu-pci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mvebu-pci.txt
> index 6173af6885f8..24225852bce0 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mvebu-pci.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mvebu-pci.txt
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ and the following optional properties:
>  - marvell,pcie-lane: the physical PCIe lane number, for ports having
>    multiple lanes. If this property is not found, we assume that the
>    value is 0.
> +- num-lanes: number of SerDes PCIe lanes for this link (1 or 4)
>  - reset-gpios: optional GPIO to PERST#
>  - reset-delay-us: delay in us to wait after reset de-assertion, if not
>    specified will default to 100ms, as required by the PCIe specification.
> @@ -141,6 +142,7 @@ pcie-controller {
>  		interrupt-map = <0 0 0 0 &mpic 58>;
>  		marvell,pcie-port = <0>;
>  		marvell,pcie-lane = <0>;
> +		num-lanes = <1>;

Is this patch really necessary?  AFAICS, the related driver change
only sets "port->is_x4 = true" when "num-lanes = <4>", and in all
other cases it defaults to a Max Link Width of 1:

  lnkcap |= (port->is_x4 ? 4 : 1) << 4;

I don't see the point of adding a value that we don't validate or do
anything with.  E.g., I don't see an error message that would catch
"num-lanes = <3>".

Bjorn