Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <32ae6671-510c-9a9f-3e01-93a8f45ede7a@leemhuis.info>
Date:   Fri, 25 Feb 2022 12:56:23 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] docs: add two texts covering regressions
Content-Language: en-BS
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     workflows@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        regressions@lists.linux.dev,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1644994117.git.linux@leemhuis.info>
 <871qzskpf8.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
From:   Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
In-Reply-To: <871qzskpf8.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 24.02.22 20:58, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info> writes:
> 
>> "We don't cause regressions" might be the first rule of Linux kernel
>> development, but it and other aspects of regressions nevertheless are hardly
>> described in the Linux kernel's documentation. The following patches change
>> this by creating two documents dedicated to the topic.
>>
>> The second patch could easily be folded into the first one, but was kept
>> separate, as it might be a bit controversial. This also allows the patch
>> description to explain some backgrounds for this part of the document.
>> Additionally, ACKs and Reviewed-by tags can be collected separately this way.
> 
> Hearing no objections, I have applied this set, thanks.

Great, thx!

Ciao, Thorsten