Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
From:   Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
        michal.simek@xilinx.com, git@xilinx.com
Cc:     Mahesh Bodapati <mbodapat@xilinx.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] microblaze: Fix issues with freestanding
Date:   Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:55:33 +0100
Message-Id: <cover.1645797329.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

with GCC 10 there is issue with simple memset implementation which is
called recursively. There are couple of discussions about it and the first
two patches are trying to workaround this.
The third patch only removes simple implementations from arch code and use
generic one which is the same.

Thanks,
Michal

I sent only 1 patch in v1 that's why sending v2 with all 3.


Changes in v2:
- missing patch in v1
- missing patch in v1

Michal Simek (3):
  microblaze: Use simple memset implementation from lib/string.c
  microblaze: Do loop unrolling for optimized memset implementation
  microblaze: Use simple memmove/memcpy implementation from lib/string.c

 arch/microblaze/include/asm/string.h |  2 ++
 arch/microblaze/lib/memcpy.c         | 18 ++-------------
 arch/microblaze/lib/memmove.c        | 29 ++----------------------
 arch/microblaze/lib/memset.c         | 33 ++++++++++++----------------
 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)

-- 
2.35.1