Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Siddharth Chandrasekaran <sidcha@amazon.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: hyper-v: XMM fast hypercalls fixes
In-Reply-To: <b466b80c-21d1-f298-b4cd-a4b58988f767@redhat.com>
References: <20220222154642.684285-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
 <b466b80c-21d1-f298-b4cd-a4b58988f767@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:13:58 +0100
Message-ID: <871qzrdr6x.fsf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:

> On 2/22/22 16:46, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> While working on some Hyper-V TLB flush improvements and Direct TLB flush
>> feature for Hyper-V on KVM I experienced Windows Server 2019 crashes on
>> boot when XMM fast hypercall input feature is advertised. Turns out,
>> HVCALL_SEND_IPI_EX is also an XMM fast hypercall and returning an error
>> kills the guest. This is fixed in PATCH4. PATCH3 fixes erroneous capping
>> of sparse CPU banks for XMM fast TLB flush hypercalls. The problem should
>> be reproducible with >360 vCPUs.
>> 
>> Vitaly Kuznetsov (4):
>>    KVM: x86: hyper-v: Drop redundant 'ex' parameter from
>>      kvm_hv_send_ipi()
>>    KVM: x86: hyper-v: Drop redundant 'ex' parameter from
>>      kvm_hv_flush_tlb()
>>    KVM: x86: hyper-v: Fix the maximum number of sparse banks for XMM fast
>>      TLB flush hypercalls
>>    KVM: x86: hyper-v: HVCALL_SEND_IPI_EX is an XMM fast hypercall
>> 
>>   arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>   1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>> 
>
> Merging this in 5.18 is a bit messy.  Please check that the below
> patch against kvm/next makes sense:

Something is wrong with the diff as it doesn't apply :-(

>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> index 653e08c993c4..98fb998c31ce 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> @@ -1770,9 +1770,11 @@ struct kvm_hv_hcall {
>   };
>   
>   static u64 kvm_get_sparse_vp_set(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc,
> +				 int consumed_xmm_halves,
>   				 u64 *sparse_banks, gpa_t offset)
>   {
>   	u16 var_cnt;
> +	int i;
>   
>   	if (hc->var_cnt > 64)
>   		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1780,13 +1782,29 @@ static u64 kvm_get_sparse_vp_set(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc,
>   	/* Ignore banks that cannot possibly contain a legal VP index. */
>   	var_cnt = min_t(u16, hc->var_cnt, KVM_HV_MAX_SPARSE_VCPU_SET_BITS);
>   
> +	if (hc->fast) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Each XMM holds two sparse banks, but do not count halves that
> +		 * have already been consumed for hypercall parameters.
> +		 */
> +		if (hc->var_cnt > 2 * HV_HYPERCALL_MAX_XMM_REGISTERS - consumed_xmm_halves)
> +			return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
> +		for (i = 0; i < var_cnt; i++) {
> +			int j = i + consumed_xmm_halves;
> +			if (j % 2)
> +				sparse_banks[i] = sse128_lo(hc->xmm[j / 2]);
> +			else
> +				sparse_banks[i] = sse128_hi(hc->xmm[j / 2]);

Let's say we have 1 half of XMM0 consumed. Now:

 i = 0;
 j = 1;
 if (1) 
     sparse_banks[0] = sse128_lo(hc->xmm[0]); 

 This doesn't look right as we need to get the upper half of XMM0.

 I guess it should be reversed, 

     if (j % 2)
         sparse_banks[i] = sse128_hi(hc->xmm[j / 2]);
     else
         sparse_banks[i] = sse128_lo(hc->xmm[j / 2]);

> +		}
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>   	return kvm_read_guest(kvm, hc->ingpa + offset, sparse_banks,
>   			      var_cnt * sizeof(*sparse_banks));
>   }
>   
> -static u64 kvm_hv_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc, bool ex)
> +static u64 kvm_hv_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc)
>   {
> -	int i;
>   	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>   	struct hv_tlb_flush_ex flush_ex;
>   	struct hv_tlb_flush flush;
> @@ -1803,7 +1821,8 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc, bool
>   	 */
>   	BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_HV_MAX_SPARSE_VCPU_SET_BITS > 64);
>   
> -	if (!ex) {
> +	if (hc->code == HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST ||
> +	    hc->code == HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_SPACE) {

In case you're trying to come up with a smaller patch for 5.18, we can
certainly drop these 'ex'/'non-ex' changes as these are merely
cosmetic.

>   		if (hc->fast) {
>   			flush.address_space = hc->ingpa;
>   			flush.flags = hc->outgpa;
> @@ -1859,17 +1878,7 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc, bool
>   		if (!hc->var_cnt)
>   			goto ret_success;
>   
> -		if (hc->fast) {
> -			if (hc->var_cnt > HV_HYPERCALL_MAX_XMM_REGISTERS - 1)
> -				return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
> -			for (i = 0; i < hc->var_cnt; i += 2) {
> -				sparse_banks[i] = sse128_lo(hc->xmm[i / 2 + 1]);
> -				sparse_banks[i + 1] = sse128_hi(hc->xmm[i / 2 + 1]);
> -			}
> -			goto do_flush;
> -		}
> -
> -		if (kvm_get_sparse_vp_set(kvm, hc, sparse_banks,
> +		if (kvm_get_sparse_vp_set(kvm, hc, 2, sparse_banks,
>   					  offsetof(struct hv_tlb_flush_ex,
>   						   hv_vp_set.bank_contents)))

I like your idea to put 'consumed_xmm_halves' into
kvm_get_sparse_vp_set() as kvm_hv_flush_tlb is getting too big.

>   			return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
> @@ -1913,7 +1922,7 @@ static void kvm_send_ipi_to_many(struct kvm *kvm, u32 vector,
>   	}
>   }
>   
> -static u64 kvm_hv_send_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc, bool ex)
> +static u64 kvm_hv_send_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc)
>   {
>   	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>   	struct hv_send_ipi_ex send_ipi_ex;
> @@ -1924,7 +1933,7 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_send_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc, bool
>   	u32 vector;
>   	bool all_cpus;
>   
> -	if (!ex) {
> +	if (hc->code == HVCALL_SEND_IPI) {
>   		if (!hc->fast) {
>   			if (unlikely(kvm_read_guest(kvm, hc->ingpa, &send_ipi,
>   						    sizeof(send_ipi))))
> @@ -1943,9 +1952,15 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_send_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc, bool
>   
>   		trace_kvm_hv_send_ipi(vector, sparse_banks[0]);
>   	} else {
> -		if (unlikely(kvm_read_guest(kvm, hc->ingpa, &send_ipi_ex,
> -					    sizeof(send_ipi_ex))))
> -			return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
> +		if (!hc->fast) {
> +			if (unlikely(kvm_read_guest(kvm, hc->ingpa, &send_ipi_ex,
> +						    sizeof(send_ipi_ex))))
> +				return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
> +		} else {
> +			send_ipi_ex.vector = (u32)hc->ingpa;
> +			send_ipi_ex.vp_set.format = hc->outgpa;
> +			send_ipi_ex.vp_set.valid_bank_mask = sse128_lo(hc->xmm[0]);
> +		}
>   
>   		trace_kvm_hv_send_ipi_ex(send_ipi_ex.vector,
>   					 send_ipi_ex.vp_set.format,
> @@ -1964,7 +1979,7 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_send_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc, bool
>   		if (!hc->var_cnt)
>   			goto ret_success;
>   
> -		if (kvm_get_sparse_vp_set(kvm, hc, sparse_banks,
> +		if (kvm_get_sparse_vp_set(kvm, hc, 1, sparse_banks,
>   					  offsetof(struct hv_send_ipi_ex,
>   						   vp_set.bank_contents)))
>   			return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
> @@ -2126,6 +2141,7 @@ static bool is_xmm_fast_hypercall(struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc)
>   	case HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_SPACE:
>   	case HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST_EX:
>   	case HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_SPACE_EX:
> +	case HVCALL_SEND_IPI_EX:
>   		return true;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -2283,46 +2299,43 @@ int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   				kvm_hv_hypercall_complete_userspace;
>   		return 0;
>   	case HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST:
> -		if (unlikely(!hc.rep_cnt || hc.rep_idx || hc.var_cnt)) {
> +		if (unlikely(hc.var_cnt)) {
>   			ret = HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
>   			break;
>   		}
> -		ret = kvm_hv_flush_tlb(vcpu, &hc, false);
> -		break;
> -	case HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_SPACE:
> -		if (unlikely(hc.rep || hc.var_cnt)) {
> -			ret = HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
> -			break;
> -		}
> -		ret = kvm_hv_flush_tlb(vcpu, &hc, false);
> -		break;
> +		fallthrough;
>   	case HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST_EX:
>   		if (unlikely(!hc.rep_cnt || hc.rep_idx)) {
>   			ret = HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
>   			break;
>   		}
> -		ret = kvm_hv_flush_tlb(vcpu, &hc, true);
> +		ret = kvm_hv_flush_tlb(vcpu, &hc);
>   		break;
> +	case HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_SPACE:
> +		if (unlikely(hc.var_cnt)) {
> +			ret = HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		fallthrough;
>   	case HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_SPACE_EX:
>   		if (unlikely(hc.rep)) {
>   			ret = HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
>   			break;
>   		}
> -		ret = kvm_hv_flush_tlb(vcpu, &hc, true);
> +		ret = kvm_hv_flush_tlb(vcpu, &hc);
>   		break;
>   	case HVCALL_SEND_IPI:
> -		if (unlikely(hc.rep || hc.var_cnt)) {
> +		if (unlikely(hc.var_cnt)) {
>   			ret = HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
>   			break;
>   		}
> -		ret = kvm_hv_send_ipi(vcpu, &hc, false);
> -		break;
> +		fallthrough;
>   	case HVCALL_SEND_IPI_EX:
> -		if (unlikely(hc.fast || hc.rep)) {
> +		if (unlikely(hc.rep)) {
>   			ret = HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
>   			break;
>   		}
> -		ret = kvm_hv_send_ipi(vcpu, &hc, true);
> +		ret = kvm_hv_send_ipi(vcpu, &hc);
>   		break;
>   	case HVCALL_POST_DEBUG_DATA:
>   	case HVCALL_RETRIEVE_DEBUG_DATA:

I've smoke tested this (with the change I've mentioned above) and WS2019
booted with 65 vCPUs. This is a good sign)

>
>
> The resulting merge commit is already in kvm/queue shortly (which should
> become the next kvm/next as soon as tests complete).
>

I see, please swap sse128_lo()/sse128_hi() there too :-)

-- 
Vitaly