Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 16:16:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 16:16:37 -0500 Received: from Morgoth.esiway.net ([193.194.16.157]:59154 "EHLO Morgoth.esiway.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 16:16:22 -0500 Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 22:16:19 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Colombo To: Arjan van de Ven cc: Subject: Re: linux 2.4.13 Kernel and Ext3 vs Ext2 In-Reply-To: <20011125144902.A9714@fenrus.demon.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 12:28:27AM +1000, James Davies wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Nov 2001 23:37, arjan@fenrus.demon.nl wrote: > > > In article <20011125132713Z280878-17408+19757@vger.kernel.org> you wrote: > > > > You can also download a kernel RPM. the latest one released by redhat is > > > > 2.4.13, and it is pretty much guaranteed to work with your current system > > > > and not break anything. It is also be patched with ext3 support. > > > > > > Ehmmm..... The last released kernel by Red Hat is 2.4.9-13, not > > > 2.4.13-something.... > > > > ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/rawhide/1.0/i386/RedHat/RPMS/kernel-2.4.13-0.6.i386.rpm > > rawhide != released !!!!! > rawhide is a weekly development snapshot that is taken at basically a random > time. Those kernels have seen no QA and are untested, they might not even > boot. That's only half of the truth. Go and search bugzilla at Red Hat. They have many bugs in a 'fixed in Rawhide' status. I see that having a 'not yet QA-tested' fix it's better than not having it at all, but it's also true that they mark the bug 'CLOSED' after putting it in 'fixed in Rawhide' state. IMHO, that's quite an official statement about the bug itself. It means go and use rawhide (not as a whole, of course). They should leave the bug OPEN until an official *errata* exists. Otherwise, people get the idea that rawhide == errata. Thus, kind of released. > You're very welcome to help betatest them, and I welcome all bugreports > against them; however considering them as released... no Ehm, I admit the above might not be true for *kernel* rpms. I'm not aware of any major kernel bug that has been fixed in rawhide and *not* in errata. But rahwide is more than a just random snapshot, it's also a place to look for fixes. I mean, a place where Red Hat officially says you should be looking for fixes. A simple search on bugzilla shows 78 CLOSED bugs with resolution == RAWHIDE (it may be just an update problem, of course). I hope the 'you keep the pieces' things is not true for 'CLOSED' bugs. But this is quite OT, of course. Please move further discussion to private mail. > > Greetings, > Arjan van de Ven > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > .TM. - a happy Red Hat user - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/