Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2993009AbXBQSCJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:02:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2993008AbXBQSCJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:02:09 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]:20444 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2993007AbXBQSCI (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:02:08 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=D4kri1IQTBpLlicKewC9xNxaOBuSxTRpSzbi8WvMQ2QCn5MjMl4GvmAzep7SI4HtRYMZJ0b37qZrk/P08bkufn2gWLx8fZk26y2EdEQAaFGMtFUpzPjp8vJyv2dimiCIFJjmyYhrgmXaWfvbgg1HamnCUfXhNOEcd9LBxKgSXV0= Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 20:59:18 +0300 From: "Cyrill V. Gorcunov" To: Evgeniy Polyakov Cc: linux-kernel-list Subject: Re: [patch 05/11] syslets: core code Message-ID: <20070217175918.GA10307@cvg> References: <20070215190413.GA23953@2ka.mipt.ru> <20070216085706.GA22868@2ka.mipt.ru> <20070216160525.GA21160@2ka.mipt.ru> <2c0942db0702160853s18f650ccsa7270c047d94a41b@mail.gmail.com> <20070216165854.GA18522@2ka.mipt.ru> <20070216202036.GA10190@cvg> <20070217100159.GA15971@2ka.mipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070217100159.GA15971@2ka.mipt.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1061 Lines: 28 On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 01:02:00PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: [... snipped ...] | Yes, I only proposed to change what Ingo has right now - although it is | usable, but it does suck, but since overall syslet design is indeed good | it does not suffer from possible interface changes - so I said that it | can be trivially changed in that regard that until it is committed | anything can be done to extend it. | | -- | Evgeniy Polyakov | I think Evgeniy - you are right! For times of research _changing_ a lot of things is almost a low. syslets are in test area and why should we bound ourself in survey of best. If something in syslets is sucks so lets change it as early as possible. Of course I mean no more interface changing after some _commit_ point (and that should be Linus decision). -- Cyrill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/