Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220213025739.2561834-1-liambeguin@gmail.com>
 <20220227125559.72d5d79a@jic23-huawei> <20220227130546.5ed0bae1@jic23-huawei>
In-Reply-To: <20220227130546.5ed0bae1@jic23-huawei>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 27 Feb 2022 15:25:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdNg--SAZ=8XqfZuhQ4iX3b9_O3psWHZZL8kO5hf7n14g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 00/10] iio: afe: add temperature rescaling support
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc:     Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>, Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 2:58 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 12:55:59 +0000
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Feb 2022 21:57:29 -0500
> > Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Jonathan, Peter, Andy,
> > >
> > > This series focuses on adding temperature rescaling support to the IIO
> > > Analog Front End (AFE) driver.
> > >
> > > The main changes to the AFE driver include an initial Kunit test suite,
> > > support for IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_{NANO,MICRO} scales, and support for RTDs
> > > and temperature transducer sensors.

...

> > I was waiting for Andy to reply to this. Took a quick look back at
> > what was outstanding and realised he had given a
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> > for v13.
>
> Actually given the units.h change is a perhaps non trivial perhaps that's
> why you dropped Andy's RB.  I'll still apply the series, but it Andy
> confirms his view on that tag before I push this out as something I can't
> rebase I'll add it if appropriate.

Since it was a separate patch, I'm fine with not including it due to
strong argument from Peter.

> > I'm assuming there wasn't a strong reason to drop that in the meantime
> > and it's a simple omission / crossed emails issue.
> >
> > As such,
> >
> > Series applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out
> > as testing to get some build coverage from 0-day.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko