Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S281116AbRKYVpa>; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 16:45:30 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S281105AbRKYVpV>; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 16:45:21 -0500
Received: from ids.big.univali.br ([200.169.51.11]:29313 "HELO
	mail.big.univali.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S281103AbRKYVpA>; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 16:45:00 -0500
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 19:44:55 -0200 (BRST)
From: Marcus Grando <marcus@big.univali.br>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Idea for next kernels stables
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.42.0111251928240.3571-100000@ids.big.univali.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


Hi,

I have an idea for next kernels stables.

Before pre?s releases a release -rc it would have the paper of final test, 
not to have problem of a stable version to leave with problems.

The finality of -rc release it would be only test, and any alteration 
would be created new - rc.

As knows some people place the steady versions in its systems without if 
worrying about instability of it.

But an idea.

Regards,

-- 
Marcus Grando
UNIVALI

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/