Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2993076AbXBRCjF (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:39:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2993091AbXBRCjF (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:39:05 -0500 Received: from mail10.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.191]:39565 "EHLO mail10.syd.optusnet.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2993076AbXBRCjE (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:39:04 -0500 References: <200702162110.03355.kernel@kolivas.org> <1c1c86360702171814m35265b01pe391df87d5f9db76@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Con Kolivas To: mdew =?UTF-8?B?Lg==?= Cc: linux kernel mailing list , ck@vds.kolivas.org Subject: Re: 2.6.20-ck1 Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:38:59 +1100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 784 Lines: 24 mdew . writes: > On 2/16/07, Con Kolivas wrote: >> This patchset is designed to improve system responsiveness and interactivity. >> It is configurable to any workload but the default -ck patch is aimed at the >> desktop and -cks is available with more emphasis on serverspace. >> >> Apply to 2.6.20 > > any benchmarks for 2.6.20-ck vs 2.6.20? Would some -ck user on the mailing list like to perform a set of interbench benchmarks? They're pretty straight forward to do; see: http://interbench.kolivas.org -- -ck - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/