Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220222042700.385001-1-yusisamerican@gmail.com>
 <CAJoG2+-97KyWrxym2NXECRtjT9OxVQE_=DcNkUfOsPm_Ax90Aw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220225155208.GA1377611@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> <DM6PR11MB3819C9631EAED0AFE7E8D99B85019@DM6PR11MB3819.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAJoG2+--e6BqpwBYO0w4d_aUwmCmJVch=mvfq7idW__PRxsv6w@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR11MB3819F561A8EEB59D9EA1482685029@DM6PR11MB3819.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB3819F561A8EEB59D9EA1482685029@DM6PR11MB3819.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From:   Yusuf Khan <yusisamerican@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Feb 2022 18:59:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJoG2+8j5P11h8HQPbR7W8dQ2WnTF41dtVoztOuxhxqqk5OwDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] pga: dfl: pci: Make sure DMA related error check is
 not done twice
To:     "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@intel.com>
Cc:     "Xu, Yilun" <yilun.xu@intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org>,
        "mdf@kernel.org" <mdf@kernel.org>,
        "trix@redhat.com" <trix@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Done. Resent

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 6:34 PM Wu, Hao <hao.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yusuf Khan <yusisamerican@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 9:59 AM
> > To: Wu, Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> > Cc: Xu, Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > fpga@vger.kernel.org; mdf@kernel.org; trix@redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] pga: dfl: pci: Make sure DMA related error check is
> > not done twice
> >
> > Will do, but I do not know exactly what to remove  from the commit message,
> > I understand what to do for the title
>
> > > > > > NOTE: This patch is only for use in the linux-next branch as the
> > > > > > commit that caused this bug happened there.
>
> Remove this NOTE
>
> Hao
>
> >
> > Yusuf
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:58 AM Wu, Hao <hao.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 08:39:48PM -0800, Yusuf Khan wrote:
> > > > > Note: This bug was introduced here:
> > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-
> > > > next.git/patch/?id=ada3caabaf6135150077c3f729bb06e8f3b5b8f6
> > > > > I saw this commit inside the linux-next branch, it is not present in
> > > > > the mainline branch.
> > > > > The linux-next branch was last updated 5 days ago, so I am unsure
> > > > > about the state of that commit.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 8:27 PM Yusuf Khan <yusisamerican@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In the case that the DMA 64 bit bit mask error check does not fail,
> > > > > > the error check will be done twice, this patch fixed that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > NOTE: This patch is only for use in the linux-next branch as the
> > > > > > commit that caused this bug happened there.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the patch.
> > > please remove this from the commit message, and fix the title
> > > s/pga/fpga/
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Hao
> > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yusuf Khan <yusisamerican@gmail.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c | 9 +++++----
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > > > > > index 717ac9715970..6222f18aed4b 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > > > > > @@ -356,11 +356,12 @@ int cci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const
> > > > struct pci_device_id *pcidevid)
> > > > > >         pci_set_master(pcidev);
> > > > > >
> > > > > >         ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pcidev->dev,
> > DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> > > > > > -       if (ret)
> > > > > > -               ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pcidev->dev,
> > > > DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> > > > > >         if (ret) {
> > > > > > -               dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "No suitable DMA support available.\n");
> > > > > > -               goto disable_error_report_exit;
> > > > > > +               ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pcidev->dev,
> > > > DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> > > > > > +               if (ret) {
> > > > > > +                       dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "No suitable DMA support
> > > > available.\n");
> > > > > > +                       goto disable_error_report_exit;
> > > > > > +               }
> > > >
> > > > Looks good to me.
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > > >         }
> > > > > >
> > > > > >         ret = cci_init_drvdata(pcidev);
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > > >