Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9afc:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id t28csp3403313pxm; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 19:39:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/3giDB4AHCIibsb/WgL/ccqjuvCdxXtcdWC0v2KKC/BzQYXjDsV+JVuesJnhfH2ARzfqk X-Received: by 2002:a65:6842:0:b0:375:983d:7e5b with SMTP id q2-20020a656842000000b00375983d7e5bmr18963787pgt.496.1646105983295; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 19:39:43 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1646105983; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gJtnj657HFQSVGY2uBJ8q+l3txo7t2wlahF51BOcUIq8CChSiYrZGEz4JcWlH8zUmy gUFQaQkkWEIetrfAlPH2vOZ5gWRWjqJqyuFeXYPUGOEgZbAEhtUDgoOvY4ErHuCeHhDa afUYaMXKHDr6HOS+exluWBXb7hm9SSULDRwxh7BAxLF3KDl4/1aVzrXJGu/cYP+qqDMG Yz8yUCIelXwkB3hvnNzIZ98gAbeNweR117iBFQixvyOGlVHYkV3llCeF7WjSiwce9e12 bua0J/J+dSmPvV5ejP0tRHnRKc3rb5DLlwvuHII1GlHOeePpjmHzi0YmBQKX1Qp1FtE9 Rk9w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:message-id:date:cc:to:from:subject:dkim-signature; bh=7imNU06IH+3tVdAn+Lkfe6MB5jL4Xa41Co+RgoJrZqs=; b=iFOz569ZQL7m9kt+D0SkaDXSsIdi4dlvUg8cFO4UiOyqzkj2C+wRyH3WUC45WGL6UL MVfgnKML3ikc8K4AYZEFzxOpVdUWvrCUxOl7FuxIYw4cIEy2uzpw/V90KUf+zGcdmMk9 EHZP1cb1rdOFwqmysvutrwda9u5JKh4JK4mzKZqppYVCT9a7u4wv2wYQvvAfPC8VsgbF EtADAo5eMfAXXFMq7URuvB45RSEIUJgfNUfihf5qUkMivJY2vUN6gcWWo1B9qzJZdAr/ Lf9p72JXDDDCxL5bPCfQuIhu9xqiB1CKuyfNZfhWtVqsBEbyX1F/LgptcKBsYY78Pg3v 2Cmw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=h2xqxiWU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c15-20020a17090a8d0f00b001bc85dd4079si1210277pjo.174.2022.02.28.19.39.26; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 19:39:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=h2xqxiWU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231401AbiCACtb (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 28 Feb 2022 21:49:31 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59188 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231405AbiCACt3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Feb 2022 21:49:29 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC99F4615E; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 18:48:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1646102930; x=1677638930; h=subject:from:to:cc:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=9v1Lc6js6J0RC266u9huI1+teYKaYlCTxCY2FduzRBM=; b=h2xqxiWUNFh62yEOwHtp2Ysb9KIus8Shs2lSJbllXGti2DF7JvE4lWGq 8nqYU2dF4KbKY1D4uJsIEl7RpIhRVQWxBCBK3Cn3B9fO5JoUlgSAPUL+h 6ZBm8qZ+gVBTRzmipsGPLLdCFW6fCNUVz0Z7Hk4VUpxa7Zpo0NMD8yogT JnlJ/8UPC+px8vIWvVfx9M28BHqaiYHqNt2YqxHjnBvP3oxNymnYrzfXK SkxS5wAueTcZzZR57eM4Xyr85FhLia4ooBbO0QdHMqfYTUN08aYh3lscm EToirlzE9eV0mF3iKClJgiLGF042Eh63eV2yC9ahhPzu90JDMV9uik+3Y w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10272"; a="316256470" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,144,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="316256470" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Feb 2022 18:48:49 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,144,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="492947479" Received: from dwillia2-desk3.jf.intel.com (HELO dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com) ([10.54.39.25]) by orsmga003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Feb 2022 18:48:49 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 00/11] device-core: Generic device-lock lockdep validation From: Dan Williams To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Cc: Ira Weiny , Ben Widawsky , Vishal Verma , Dave Jiang , Alison Schofield , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 18:48:49 -0800 Message-ID: <164610292916.2682974.12924748003366352335.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: StGit/0.18-3-g996c MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg, Rafael, Here are some extensions to the 'lockdep_mutex' I came up with after getting tired of alternating debug builds between CXL and NVDIMM subsystem testing, and worrying about the missing lockdep coverage from device-lock acquisition in the device-core. The primary insight is that the existing users of the 'lockdep_mutex' are just wrapping calls to device_lock() with a subsystem local helper that can apply the proper lock_class for how those subsystems nest the device_lock(). Instead of local wrapping just instruct the subsystem to annotate the lock_class directly in the device and let the device_lock() common code handle acquiring lockdep_mutex with the proper class. The final patch in the series extends this further and adds an array of lockdep_mutex instances, 1 per subsystem, so that multiple subsystems can be validated in a single kernel image. This has been useful for identifying scenarios when it is safe to acquire the device_lock() in a sysfs attribute. Thoughts? I know its late in the cycle to be messing with device-core internals, so feel free to put this off until 5.19. This series is based on the cxl_device_lock() enabling that is currently in -next. --- Dan Williams (11): device-core: Enable lockdep validation cxl/core: Refactor a cxl_lock_class() out of cxl_nested_lock() cxl/core: Remove cxl_device_lock() cxl/core: Clamp max lock_class cxl/core: Introduce cxl_set_lock_class() cxl/acpi: Add a lock class for the root platform device libnvdimm: Refactor an nvdimm_lock_class() helper ACPI: NFIT: Drop nfit_device_lock() libnvdimm: Drop nd_device_lock() libnvdimm: Enable lockdep validation device-core: Introduce a per-subsystem lockdep_mutex drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 30 +++++---- drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h | 24 ------- drivers/base/core.c | 5 -- drivers/cxl/acpi.c | 1 drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c | 1 drivers/cxl/core/pmem.c | 6 +- drivers/cxl/core/port.c | 52 ++++++++-------- drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 1 drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 72 ++++++++-------------- drivers/cxl/mem.c | 4 + drivers/cxl/pmem.c | 12 ++-- drivers/cxl/port.c | 2 - drivers/nvdimm/btt_devs.c | 16 ++--- drivers/nvdimm/bus.c | 26 ++++---- drivers/nvdimm/core.c | 10 ++- drivers/nvdimm/dimm_devs.c | 8 +- drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c | 36 +++++------ drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h | 51 ++++----------- drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c | 24 ++++--- drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 2 - drivers/nvdimm/region.c | 2 - drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c | 16 ++--- include/linux/device.h | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- lib/Kconfig.debug | 23 ------- 24 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 263 deletions(-) base-commit: 74be98774dfbc5b8b795db726bd772e735d2edd4