Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 1 Mar 2022 00:13:43 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com, jonathan.derrick@linux.dev,
        lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, hch@infradead.org, kw@linux.com,
        robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
        michael.a.bottini@linux.intel.com, rafael@kernel.org,
        me@adhityamohan.in, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/3] PCI/ASPM: Add pci_enable_default_link_state()
Message-ID: <Yh3Vt6/WzoAasPxZ@infradead.org>
References: <20220301041943.2935892-1-david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
 <20220301041943.2935892-2-david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220301041943.2935892-2-david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 08:19:41PM -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> +	down_read(&pci_bus_sem);
> +	mutex_lock(&aspm_lock);
> +	link->aspm_default = 0;
> +	if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S)
> +		link->aspm_default |= ASPM_STATE_L0S;
> +	if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1)
> +		/* L1 PM substates require L1 */
> +		link->aspm_default |= ASPM_STATE_L1 | ASPM_STATE_L1SS;
> +	if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1_1)
> +		link->aspm_default |= ASPM_STATE_L1_1;
> +	if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1_2)
> +		link->aspm_default |= ASPM_STATE_L1_2;
> +	if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1_1_PCIPM)
> +		link->aspm_default |= ASPM_STATE_L1_1_PCIPM;
> +	if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1_2_PCIPM)
> +		link->aspm_default |= ASPM_STATE_L1_2_PCIPM;
> +	pcie_config_aspm_link(link, policy_to_aspm_state(link));

Is there any reason the ASPM_* values aren't passed directly to this
function?