Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 1 Mar 2022 09:33:59 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
        Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@renesas.com>,
        linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document
 RZ/V2L SoC
Message-ID: <Yh4855Np63fEUl4G@robh.at.kernel.org>
References: <20220227213250.23637-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220227213250.23637-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 09:32:50PM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> Document RZ/V2L CANFD bindings. RZ/V2L CANFD is identical to one found on
> the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible
> string "renesas,rzg2l-canfd" will be used as a fallback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
> ---
> DTSI changes [0] have been posted as part of separate series.
> 
> [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/
> 20220227203744.18355-4-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml          | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

The patch wouldn't apply, but I don't see the problem other than the 
sha hashes are not from a known base. Please send patches against a 
known rcX (rc1 is preferred) unless you have some other dependency. And 
document that dependency.

Anyways, it is applied manually now.

Rob