Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 1 Mar 2022 07:56:30 -0800
From:   Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 33/44] memremap_pages: Introduce
 pgmap_protection_available()
Message-ID: <Yh5CLkGeN7dlLxtr@iweiny-desk3>
References: <20220127175505.851391-1-ira.weiny@intel.com>
 <20220127175505.851391-34-ira.weiny@intel.com>
 <CAPcyv4gWcs5u1vRMjzQwJque98u_6MPTWKOFb6XS273egyiXHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <Yhz/gK9K6KtON0bq@iweiny-desk3>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Yhz/gK9K6KtON0bq@iweiny-desk3>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 08:59:44AM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 08:19:43AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 9:55 AM <ira.weiny@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > > @@ -63,6 +64,16 @@ static void devmap_managed_enable_put(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
> > >  }
> > >  #endif /* CONFIG_DEV_PAGEMAP_OPS */
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEVMAP_ACCESS_PROTECTION
> > > +
> > > +bool pgmap_protection_available(void)
> > > +{
> > > +       return pks_available();
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pgmap_protection_available);
> > 
> > Any reason this was chosen to be an out-of-line function? Doesn't this
> > defeat the performance advantages of static_cpu_has()?
> 
> Unfortunately, yes.  pkeys.h includes mm.h which means I can't include pkeys.h
> here in mm.h.
> 
> Let me see what I can do.  In patch 11 I created pks-keys.h.  Let me see if I
> can leverage that header instead of pkeys.h.
> 
> When I created that header I was thinking that the user and supervisor pkey
> functions may need even more separation in the headers but I was fearful of
> putting too much in pks-keys.h because it was created to avoid conflicts in
> asm/processor.h.  Looking at it again I think pks_available() may be ok in
> pks-keys.h.

Ok I've reworked the series to allow for this.  However, pks-keys.h was not
sufficient.  That header needs to be specific to the definition of the keys
themselves (hence the name).

In order to facilitate this change I've introduced another header linux/pks.h
which separates out the supervisor specific calls from the user pkeys calls.
It worked out well and I think makes a lot of sense due to the different
functionality.  But I'm pretty bad at names so I'm open to changing the name of
the header if 'pks.h' seems too generic.

Ira

> 
> Ira
> 
> > 
> > > +
> > > +#endif /* CONFIG_DEVMAP_ACCESS_PROTECTION */
> > > +
> > >  static void pgmap_array_delete(struct range *range)
> > >  {
> > >         xa_store_range(&pgmap_array, PHYS_PFN(range->start), PHYS_PFN(range->end),
> > > --
> > > 2.31.1
> > >