Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 1 Mar 2022 22:06:20 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Cc:     Yu Tu <yu.tu@amlogic.com>, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] tty: serial: meson: Fix the compile link error
 reported by kernel test robot
Message-ID: <Yh6KzOU4xsSB0lRf@kroah.com>
References: <20220228135530.6918-1-yu.tu@amlogic.com>
 <29b34655-f820-39c9-4363-878481cd3f63@baylibre.com>
 <Yh087tJhakKHs88e@kroah.com>
 <8747c5c6-a129-3a26-8ebb-9e21a18236ec@baylibre.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <8747c5c6-a129-3a26-8ebb-9e21a18236ec@baylibre.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 08:23:26AM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Le 28/02/2022 à 22:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman a écrit :
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 03:13:48PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On 28/02/2022 14:55, Yu Tu wrote:
> > > > Describes the calculation of the UART baud rate clock using a clock
> > > > frame. Forgot to add in Kconfig kernel test Robot compilation error
> > > > due to COMMON_CLK dependency.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: ("tty: serial:meson: Describes the calculation of the UART baud rate clock using a clock frame“)
> > > 
> > > As I already replied on V2 of this patch, you're invited to apply these fixes directly
> > > on the next version of your "Use CCF to describe the UART baud rate clock" patchset
> > > and not as a separate patch.
> > 
> > No, this is broken in linux-next now as the path listed here is in my
> > tree right now.
> 
> Oh, I wasn't aware you took this patchset.
> 
> > 
> > I need a fix for it, or I can revert the original.
> 
> Please revert the whole patchset, it's not ready yet, neither fully reviewed ands buggy
> on old SoCs.

Yes, will go do so now, thanks for letting me know and sorry about all
of this.

greg k-h