Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 1 Mar 2022 21:26:24 -0800
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To:     Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc:     Jing Xia <jing.xia@unisoc.com>,
        linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
        Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to avoid potential deadlock
Message-ID: <Yh8AAOjxTItKTwPQ@google.com>
References: <20220127054449.24711-1-chao@kernel.org>
 <YfMVxzdhat01ca7m@google.com>
 <e434b0a4-a66a-eebc-cafc-f0bad03c3fa5@kernel.org>
 <YfSMMpj2GrYXAJK2@google.com>
 <51be77f1-6e85-d46d-d0d3-c06d2055a190@kernel.org>
 <Yfs1KRgwgzSOvocR@google.com>
 <86a175d3-c438-505b-1dbc-4ef6e8b5adcb@kernel.org>
 <5b5e20d1-877f-b321-b341-c0f233ee976c@kernel.org>
 <51826b5f-e480-994a-4a72-39ff4572bb3f@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <51826b5f-e480-994a-4a72-39ff4572bb3f@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On 03/02, Chao Yu wrote:
> ping,
> 
> On 2022/2/25 11:02, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2022/2/3 22:57, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > On 2022/2/3 9:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > On 01/29, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > On 2022/1/29 8:37, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > > > On 01/28, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > > > On 2022/1/28 5:59, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 01/27, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Quoted from Jing Xia's report, there is a potential deadlock may happen
> > > > > > > > > between kworker and checkpoint as below:
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > [T:writeback]??????????????? [T:checkpoint]
> > > > > > > > > - wb_writeback
> > > > > > > > > ??? - blk_start_plug
> > > > > > > > > bio contains NodeA was plugged in writeback threads
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I'm still trying to understand more precisely. So, how is it possible to
> > > > > > > > have bio having node write in this current context?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > IMO, after above blk_start_plug(), it may plug some inode's node page in kworker
> > > > > > > during writebacking node_inode's data page (which should be node page)?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Wasn't that added into a different task->plug?
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'm not sure I've got your concern correctly...
> > > > > 
> > > > > Do you mean NodeA and other IOs from do_writepages() were plugged in
> > > > > different local plug variables?
> > > > 
> > > > I think so.
> > > 
> > > I guess block plug helper says it doesn't allow to use nested plug, so there
> > > is only one plug in kworker thread?

Is there only one kworker thread that flushes node and inode pages?

> > > 
> > > void blk_start_plug_nr_ios(struct blk_plug *plug, unsigned short nr_ios)
> > > {
> > > ?????struct task_struct *tsk = current;
> > > 
> > > ?????/*
> > > ????? * If this is a nested plug, don't actually assign it.
> > > ????? */
> > > ?????if (tsk->plug)
> > > ???????? return;
> > > ...
> > > }
> > 
> > Any further comments?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > ??????????????????? - do_writepages? -- sync write inodeB, inc wb_sync_req[DATA]
> > > > > > > > > ???????????????????? - f2fs_write_data_pages
> > > > > > > > > ????????????????????? - f2fs_write_single_data_page -- write last dirty page
> > > > > > > > > ?????????????????????? - f2fs_do_write_data_page
> > > > > > > > > ??????????????????????? - set_page_writeback? -- clear page dirty flag and
> > > > > > > > > ??????????????????????? PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY tag in radix tree
> > > > > > > > > ??????????????????????? - f2fs_outplace_write_data
> > > > > > > > > ???????????????????????? - f2fs_update_data_blkaddr
> > > > > > > > > ????????????????????????? - f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback -- wait NodeA to writeback here
> > > > > > > > > ?????????????????????? - inode_dec_dirty_pages
> > > > > > > > > ??? - writeback_sb_inodes
> > > > > > > > > ???? - writeback_single_inode
> > > > > > > > > ????? - do_writepages
> > > > > > > > > ?????? - f2fs_write_data_pages -- skip writepages due to wb_sync_req[DATA]
> > > > > > > > > ??????? - wbc->pages_skipped += get_dirty_pages() -- PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY is not set but get_dirty_pages() returns one
> > > > > > > > > ???? - requeue_inode -- requeue inode to wb->b_dirty queue due to non-zero.pages_skipped
> > > > > > > > > ??? - blk_finish_plug
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Let's try to avoid deadlock condition by forcing unplugging previous bio via
> > > > > > > > > blk_finish_plug(current->plug) once we'v skipped writeback in writepages()
> > > > > > > > > due to valid sbi->wb_sync_req[DATA/NODE].
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Fixes: 687de7f1010c ("f2fs: avoid IO split due to mixed WB_SYNC_ALL and WB_SYNC_NONE")
> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>
> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jing Xia <jing.xia@unisoc.com>
> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > ??? fs/f2fs/data.c | 6 +++++-
> > > > > > > > > ??? fs/f2fs/node.c | 6 +++++-
> > > > > > > > > ??? 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > > > > > > > index 76d6fe7b0c8f..932a4c81acaf 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > > > > > > > @@ -3174,8 +3174,12 @@ static int __f2fs_write_data_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> > > > > > > > > ??????? /* to avoid spliting IOs due to mixed WB_SYNC_ALL and WB_SYNC_NONE */
> > > > > > > > > ??????? if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
> > > > > > > > > ??????????? atomic_inc(&sbi->wb_sync_req[DATA]);
> > > > > > > > > -??? else if (atomic_read(&sbi->wb_sync_req[DATA]))
> > > > > > > > > +??? else if (atomic_read(&sbi->wb_sync_req[DATA])) {
> > > > > > > > > +??????? /* to avoid potential deadlock */
> > > > > > > > > +??????? if (current->plug)
> > > > > > > > > +??????????? blk_finish_plug(current->plug);
> > > > > > > > > ??????????? goto skip_write;
> > > > > > > > > +??? }
> > > > > > > > > ??????? if (__should_serialize_io(inode, wbc)) {
> > > > > > > > > ??????????? mutex_lock(&sbi->writepages);
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > > > > > > index 556fcd8457f3..69c6bcaf5aae 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > > > > > > @@ -2106,8 +2106,12 @@ static int f2fs_write_node_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> > > > > > > > > ??????? if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
> > > > > > > > > ??????????? atomic_inc(&sbi->wb_sync_req[NODE]);
> > > > > > > > > -??? else if (atomic_read(&sbi->wb_sync_req[NODE]))
> > > > > > > > > +??? else if (atomic_read(&sbi->wb_sync_req[NODE])) {
> > > > > > > > > +??????? /* to avoid potential deadlock */
> > > > > > > > > +??????? if (current->plug)
> > > > > > > > > +??????????? blk_finish_plug(current->plug);
> > > > > > > > > ??????????? goto skip_write;
> > > > > > > > > +??? }
> > > > > > > > > ??????? trace_f2fs_writepages(mapping->host, wbc, NODE);
> > > > > > > > > -- 
> > > > > > > > > 2.32.0
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel