Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 2 Mar 2022 13:46:01 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc:     Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>,
        Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com>,
        "heiko@sntech.de" <heiko@sntech.de>,
        Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK" <linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        Liang Chen <cl@rock-chips.com>,
        Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, wulf <wulf@rock-chips.com>,
        David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip: Add Naneng combo PHY
 bindings
Message-ID: <Yh8nwS7iAKgJZeFa@matsya>
References: <20220208091326.12495-1-yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com>
 <20220208091326.12495-3-yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com>
 <CAL_Jsq+1ixfw4+pwPcM5azPdC_4_bYCPu50jUvKnVMr6dSncpA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMdYzYryTb4Gvv3XENgUOSrutr7S-5a7GOMRahXWWZOeL1qKWA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAL_JsqLsLU5-bJVRWv_TzGUZdFHOx7tdzqV2piNfacNkXg=zww@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqLsLU5-bJVRWv_TzGUZdFHOx7tdzqV2piNfacNkXg=zww@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 01-03-22, 08:06, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 3:37 PM Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 2:18 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 3:15 AM Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Add the compatible strings for the Naneng combo PHY found on rockchip SoC.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v8: None
> > > > Changes in v7:
> > > > - remove u3otg0_port_en, u3otg1_port_en and pipe_sgmii_mac_sel
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v5:
> > > > - modify description for ssc and ext-refclk
> > > > - remove apb reset
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v4:
> > > > - restyle
> > > > - remove some minItems
> > > > - add more properties
> > > > - remove reset-names
> > > > - move #phy-cells
> > > > - add rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf
> > > > - add rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v3: None
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > - Fix dtschema/dtc warnings/errors
> > > >
> > > >  .../phy/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.yaml      | 109 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 109 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.yaml
> > >
> > > This now fails in linux-next:
> > >
> > > /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.example.dt.yaml:
> > > syscon@fdc50000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be
> > > fixed:
> > >  ['rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf', 'syscon'] is too short
> > >  'rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf' is not one of ['rockchip,rk3288-sgrf',
> > > 'rockchip,rk3568-usb2phy-grf', 'rockchip,rv1108-usbgrf']
> > > From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml
> > > /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.example.dt.yaml:
> > > syscon@fdc70000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be
> > > fixed:
> > >  ['rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf', 'syscon'] is too short
> > >  'rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf' is not one of ['rockchip,rk3288-sgrf',
> > > 'rockchip,rk3568-usb2phy-grf', 'rockchip,rv1108-usbgrf']
> > > From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml
> > >
> > >
> > > The problem appears to be that patch 1 was applied incorrectly and the
> > > compatibles ended up in the wrong section (the one requiring
> > > 'simple-mfd'). Patch 1 probably conflicts as my bot will just skip the
> > > patch if it conflicts which is why this had a different error report.
> >
> > Good Afternoon Rob,
> >
> > This is fixed in the first patch of my rk356x dwc3 enablement series:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/patch/20220228135700.1089526-2-pgwipeout@gmail.com/
> 
> Where does that say Vinod incorrectly applied the original patch and
> needs to apply it? What's the status of the series? Do we have to wait
> for the rest of the series to be applied?

Thanks for pointing that out, I can revert this patch so that corrected
one can be applied... Does that look better

-- 
~Vinod