Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <32164620-9ba6-db62-bc61-95c7f255d087@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Mar 2022 02:11:36 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.6.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] samples/kobject: Use sysfs_emit instead of
 snprintf
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220302120759.380932-1-phind.uet@gmail.com>
 <Yh+EdGcsoF+lBjfX@kroah.com>
From:   Phi Nguyen <phind.uet@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Yh+EdGcsoF+lBjfX@kroah.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 3/2/2022 10:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 08:07:59PM +0800, Nguyen Dinh Phi wrote:
>> Convert sprintf() to sysfs_emit() in order to check buffer overrun on sysfs
>> outputs.
> 
> There are no such buffer overruns on these sysfs files.
>
I don't want to duplicate the title so I use the description of 
sysfs_emit() as the patch message. I have just realized that the title 
is also incorrect, sorry for my mistake.

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   samples/kobject/kobject-example.c | 4 ++--
>>   samples/kobject/kset-example.c    | 4 ++--
>>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Why is this a resend?  What happened to the first version?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

There is no response for the first version. Actually, there is no 
Maintainer is associated with these two files (in MAINTAINERS files), 
hence, my first patch was only sent to the linux-kernel mailing list.

BR,
Phi.