Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932339AbXBSPQE (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:16:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932332AbXBSPQE (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:16:04 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:45376 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932339AbXBSPQD (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:16:03 -0500 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20070219145613.GB75@tv-sign.ru> References: <20070219145613.GB75@tv-sign.ru> <20070219115955.GB91@tv-sign.ru> <20070218214359.GA4226@tv-sign.ru> <8462.1171884453@redhat.com> <15331.1171890900@redhat.com> To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Andrew Morton , Jarek Poplawski , "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net/bridge/br_if.c: don't use _WORK_NAR X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:15:46 +0000 Message-ID: <22137.1171898146@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 652 Lines: 19 Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Yes, destroy_nbp() does dev_put(dev). del_nbp() sets dev->br_port = NULL, > port_carrier_check() goes to "done" in that case. So everething looks safe > to me (but again, I do not even know what the "bridge" is :), so we should > only take care about container, nothing more. Sounds like a plan. > I'll try to make a patch for illustration on evening. :-) David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/