Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220224145138.952963315@infradead.org> <20220224151322.072632223@infradead.org>
 <CAKwvOdkD2WY=hEHy8_0zs70AGx6LRQwxL5mEZyB30uqpruYJyA@mail.gmail.com>
 <Yh+dMJsH+ZMPfqwD@thelio-3990X> <CAKwvOdmouBTe5pH3JoP6EEfwNT5=6WvX3oCEZRxO0Dkf38S14w@mail.gmail.com>
 <Yh/egU1LZudfrgVy@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
In-Reply-To: <Yh/egU1LZudfrgVy@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Mar 2022 14:07:45 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdkN+pT_og0QjX+MM1dDL8-CMzt8i73tXoguB49Qza3zJA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/39] kbuild: Fix clang build
To:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, keescook@chromium.org,
        x86@kernel.org, joao@overdrivepizza.com, hjl.tools@gmail.com,
        jpoimboe@redhat.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, samitolvanen@google.com,
        mark.rutland@arm.com, alyssa.milburn@intel.com, mbenes@suse.cz,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
        alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
        llvm@lists.linux.dev
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 1:15 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 11:18:07AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > I'd be much more amenable to that approach.
>
> Sounds good, tentative patch attached, it passes all of my testing.
> There is an instance of $(LLVM) in tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk that I
> did not touch, as that will presumably have to go through the selftests
> tree. I can send a separate patch for that later.

LGTM!
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers