Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9afc:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id t28csp286578pxm; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 15:28:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJze1oAcUKW0jvV9YqfMeJjIxzq42zTugrD6CNMNjxgmAUL8s5VUp53iQi4P3KLgVUrMn+/I X-Received: by 2002:a63:d354:0:b0:372:fbd2:a22a with SMTP id u20-20020a63d354000000b00372fbd2a22amr28128834pgi.438.1646263702505; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 15:28:22 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1646263702; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GdDEYBEVVU08p82UKlIF//1gSoScGksbLtAunCyLkicLhkAInVpXXatYsrQmNR0sOF CbGQpJz1XPMqn1PoajmqZyq7jL6PNir9+NFM+zMCRUsa/hXhf8fdPt6WDeOWPkmvo/pt MlmkIdk1p83XFuD0D0wed09MoT9tDvKkfbQRIJJTjHYz0PzIB8lQ7YBEGZL5D7QxxQWa OaIBj18mK9GxA8aK2EBohlUUq7Jv/5/Le6ChTEfQByN3CpVcUNa9YJgytSC9TCZ2BbdN m8MhNkhNz8uPk53UEtZDQopMJUzVsJlKOx0me1m1+41fVKAwbESVc4cwrSKCkrRZ78ys maDA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=jEmgollfP+dnI0Ihtm3p2cZRUCRGPjqWBC7mYYxIq7c=; b=YUoNydaarg1ncrX2FJhm/vwshNUo5Nk9Hbb6jng/HvavhtC96fLp26uxClNSJg+/dm 5k5OUl2PTAyFv7J81jpZyonhfrMOo2Y0+ooDK3vZ2VAlUXp2/vwCRtWrBsea9OStXGMX kGL/JvuU2hdBIhSXko45FG5zR7CyluWiZdueSjMgneaBtzD3Qz/ab2ovYQP8Atil7ndi YBeiVOk2qGbq6kH8Tphs0bT4KDkGGq0z3gjNRoevtFdbm+tmcuWJ3qqzO5Y+gcDfvNbx jnXQM4w34iEsZPAEr0U56UwBkud+6Z9ByTE3wSLgk92ENdI/ED+nlptEaWNJe1twvXuq pZ4A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=tlAPw6lW; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [23.128.96.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d62-20020a636841000000b0037c4e327d6asi376001pgc.526.2022.03.02.15.28.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Mar 2022 15:28:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=tlAPw6lW; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AECA144F7E; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 15:00:21 -0800 (PST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237398AbiCBTXp (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 14:23:45 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59728 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235975AbiCBTXn (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 14:23:43 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ED0745054; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 11:22:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DCF3B821A3; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 19:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12911C004E1; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 19:22:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1646248976; bh=QljIzW9++PpUcQnYcc8KXlsEqKlfxH2WaPKG//6egiA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tlAPw6lWDcZ2jNLyAZrKmecShWpEr/g5ZIZNSnZGL1ALGeKTEIaoiiycogBNQm9Rq IcFzGc3PPii/IlqDhefvfcjhQvAElnj7iYLeTJPzJ84LiMZdXw4lSlYkKuP3nzC9pv f5+WOhtmTM0Z59Hh76H92N4N3xf18JGdeT+O9MUGIodvtpyT5p6tonTXIp5+ATC+3T Qs9LMryVpnYJmJdecF0kuecar83AnElBM/x883yodSM8ALsMgrQ9GeNGvFdKk4V7W1 uPptJyW+SOV1BJeVJf+FUaq0yaBfXSADBPCpDdPIE6Zm9bXtaBzeW7X16jfPyJFxfg 8oP3mvbWFNjzg== Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 11:22:55 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: David Ahern Cc: Dongli Zhang , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, imagedong@tencent.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com, joe.jin@oracle.com, edumazet@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] net: tun: track dropped skb via kfree_skb_reason() Message-ID: <20220302112255.545618dd@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <2071f8a0-148d-96fa-75b9-8277c2f87287@gmail.com> References: <20220226084929.6417-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com> <20220226084929.6417-5-dongli.zhang@oracle.com> <20220301185021.7cba195d@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <2071f8a0-148d-96fa-75b9-8277c2f87287@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 20:29:37 -0700 David Ahern wrote: > On 3/1/22 7:50 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Feb 2022 00:49:29 -0800 Dongli Zhang wrote: > >> + SKB_DROP_REASON_SKB_PULL, /* failed to pull sk_buff data */ > >> + SKB_DROP_REASON_SKB_TRIM, /* failed to trim sk_buff data */ > > > > IDK if these are not too low level and therefore lacking meaning. > > > > What are your thoughts David? > > I agree. Not every kfree_skb is worthy of a reason. "Internal > housekeeping" errors are random and nothing a user / admin can do about > drops. > > IMHO, the value of the reason code is when it aligns with SNMP counters > (original motivation for this direction) and relevant details like TCP > or UDP checksum mismatch, packets for a socket that is not open, socket > is full, ring buffer is full, packets for "other host", etc. Agreed :(