Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220228135700.1089526-1-pgwipeout@gmail.com> <20220228135700.1089526-2-pgwipeout@gmail.com>
 <CAMdYzYqs=iRY6uNzVSkHrrhPYFixXdbZjtwSpPOjf-6f8TXutw@mail.gmail.com> <Yh8n7XiJbaT4pZGD@matsya>
In-Reply-To: <Yh8n7XiJbaT4pZGD@matsya>
From:   Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Mar 2022 07:18:59 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMdYzYrkDbr5mHYmAbqBoJJEKH8A5xXfRNuTiTn8q40vRJeCgA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] dt-bindings: soc: grf: fix rk3568 usb definitions
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
        Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com>,
        Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
        Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 3:16 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 01-03-22, 09:52, Peter Geis wrote:
> > Good Morning,
> >
> > Would it be possible to pull this patch individually, to fix the
> > current error reported by Rob?
>
> This does not apply for me on phy-next. What was this based on..?

This is based on linux-next, which the applicable patch was accepted on 24 Feb.
The original patch was correct, but it seems a merge error happened
and these two lines were moved into an incorrect location.
This patch corrects that, but I see on the original patch chain you
are discussing reverting and reapplying to fix it.

>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Peter
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 8:57 AM Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf and rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf
> > > compatibles were incorrectly assigned to the syscon, simple-mfd
> > > enumeration, vice only the syscon enumeration.
> > > This leads a dtbs_check failure.
> > >
> > > Move these to the syscon enumeration.
> > >
> > > Fixes: b3df807e1fb0 ("dt-bindings: soc: grf: add naneng combo phy register compatible")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml
> > > index 072318fcd57b..5079e9d24af6 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml
> > > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ properties:
> > >        - items:
> > >            - enum:
> > >                - rockchip,rk3288-sgrf
> > > +              - rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf
> > > +              - rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf
> > >                - rockchip,rk3568-usb2phy-grf
> > >                - rockchip,rv1108-usbgrf
> > >            - const: syscon
> > > @@ -39,8 +41,6 @@ properties:
> > >                - rockchip,rk3399-grf
> > >                - rockchip,rk3399-pmugrf
> > >                - rockchip,rk3568-grf
> > > -              - rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf
> > > -              - rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf
> > >                - rockchip,rk3568-pmugrf
> > >                - rockchip,rv1108-grf
> > >                - rockchip,rv1108-pmugrf
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
>
> --
> ~Vinod