Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9afc:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id t28csp1959059pxm; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 06:53:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxMMXVbDwH4ct5N0fN3nt2xBWvnTNHtg+qjmZsEjOBsFBwIoRW56tc1tu1ebT6Xbtple78S X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c793:0:b0:408:4a69:90b4 with SMTP id n19-20020aa7c793000000b004084a6990b4mr38750215eds.58.1646405588387; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 06:53:08 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1646405588; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IOyTohhUTnsvqnMw/6+Y1AH/67ZvKK12trta/XsGOWCzDaWUA0kMl3dx1mIf+CxGS4 AmkO6IR201nLdiZyA6o35XSjpqdF3o0+is5fzZhPyPGY3IqpVtCDS1cSb8fa9xod2QAj sjCCdzbavze+D7eSRmrsmZQbIqrUXsJitOvhu4IDlJF/MP7CeJ7Zd9R9O7n0RDej5qjO Bt6iEjdyfbWcA/Ky0UqzrENmlJF5l6fWAuXNW5Agh0qUGwN/6SqND0oSi+TFxjvY616t 7wBrmS2cFrmycsdulN7GETXOwCjaL0gDjNlsTf+ggq0JH9VSk/WHhi972Bisb/pEz14l /W1Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:message-id:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:date:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=u6sPMkv3ZNhl4qtSaMaJHc7cKJmVUWN5UINM3iz3B7o=; b=unhgZuQLFubZ+rYDmO/Y9VNrtokixRnWji53DGX2yGVfL61iVdlZ40S2U0uKnHK0g6 /CYId+UgKdVXHajumYPxIZa5NiEEX+V96q1UJ8k5toZvxJecP34+m9ArTfiL8TLumxYJ gZFK2Hxm7gukoewq00NsKPCJi6NhBDhqgK3bNUV9ZO2c5H3OOIgRem5bj2kJDivZA25k V9c/vahR022ErLVRWmsRJfkw6O5aviTsMtz3HhngC7S57qdW6cXPSY2yOQb2EluM+AJW MyEHes0kkBvg70rL00YQng0W2CCFVUmloWY9OjxKrO8Uij22Qtvmt+JR9UmzvemGnnkB c50A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@walle.cc header.s=mail2016061301 header.b=dX9+GZoe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id sd9-20020a1709076e0900b006d776ad4098si4562688ejc.521.2022.03.04.06.52.44; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 06:53:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@walle.cc header.s=mail2016061301 header.b=dX9+GZoe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231616AbiCDMrg (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 4 Mar 2022 07:47:36 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54322 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229530AbiCDMre (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2022 07:47:34 -0500 Received: from ssl.serverraum.org (ssl.serverraum.org [176.9.125.105]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FA3A1B3A78 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 04:46:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from ssl.serverraum.org (web.serverraum.org [172.16.0.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ssl.serverraum.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D5AD22175; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 13:46:44 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=walle.cc; s=mail2016061301; t=1646398005; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=u6sPMkv3ZNhl4qtSaMaJHc7cKJmVUWN5UINM3iz3B7o=; b=dX9+GZoeWrG4v1wZuU11wssiDizM6RodH0n/ie1nbziaF0KVSaVJ42BwiJcfN7ISvZcHbN BeeTGIFGu/DneXVIM/FQDVcCA3DffoufsjiweSwpSel9ImVf4Jes6cIyEtOl4wfcWOjGn+ Yq6EKfBSwkTE0Zoy2dByi6TRYSAb6P8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 13:46:44 +0100 From: Michael Walle To: Horatiu Vultur Cc: Lars Povlsen , Steen Hegelund , Linus Walleij , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Colin Foster Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: wait until output is actually set In-Reply-To: <20220304120911.i5rngplg5l6gnnyy@soft-dev3-1.localhost> References: <20220224161021.2197263-1-michael@walle.cc> <20220224161021.2197263-6-michael@walle.cc> <20220225092427.jjilv3qo52crsmuw@soft-dev3-1.localhost> <2f8a215c67269d639290515931d10b78@walle.cc> <20220304120911.i5rngplg5l6gnnyy@soft-dev3-1.localhost> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.12 Message-ID: <40ccf0647d7ec0487f71f662eec80528@walle.cc> X-Sender: michael@walle.cc X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Horatiu, Am 2022-03-04 13:09, schrieb Horatiu Vultur: > The 02/25/2022 12:29, Michael Walle wrote: >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know >> the content is safe >> >> Hi Horatiu, >> >> Am 2022-02-25 10:24, schrieb Horatiu Vultur: >> > The 02/24/2022 17:10, Michael Walle wrote: >> > > Right now, when a gpio value is set, the actual hardware pin gets set >> > > asynchronously. When linux write the output register, it takes some >> > > time >> > > until it is actually propagated to the output shift registers. If that >> > > output port is connected to an I2C mux for example, the linux driver >> > > assumes the I2C bus is already switched although it is not. >> > > >> > > Fortunately, there is a single shot mode with a feedback: you can >> > > trigger the single shot and the hardware will clear that bit once it >> > > has >> > > finished the clocking and strobed the load signal of the shift >> > > registers. This can take a considerable amount of time though. >> > > Measuremens have shown that it takes up to a whole burst cycle gap >> > > which >> > > is about 50ms on the largest setting. Therefore, we have to mark the >> > > output bank as sleepable. To avoid unnecessary waiting, just trigger >> > > the >> > > single shot if the value was actually changed. >> > >> > I have tested this patch series on our lan9668 board and it worked >> > fine. Thanks! >> >> Thanks for testing! >> >> > I just have few questions: >> > 1. What about other boards/chips that have this sgpio, do they have >> > also >> > the same issue? Because from what I recall on sparx5 they don't have >> > this issue. I have seen it only on lan9668. >> >> Unfortunatly, I don't have any knowledge what IP core is used in >> which SoC. I assumed the lan9668 used the same as the sparx5. If >> that is not the case, we need a new compatible. Do you know if it >> the same? > > From what I see, it is the same IP. Good to know. >> On the sparx5 are there any peripheral who you would actually >> notice that the timing is off? > > There are some SFP connected, similar to lan966x. So I don't understand > why that issue is not seen there. Is there an I2C mux, too? Or just the SFP signals connected to the SGPIO? What I was seeing is that during probing of the SFPs the SFPs EEPROM is read and when the I2C mux is controlled by the SGPIO it will switch too late - or even worse, in the middle of a transaction. I would speculate the timing isn't that critical with signals just connected directly to the SFP. In any case, I think it is pretty clear that it cannot work the way it is right now, no? See the very next paragraph... >> That being said, I'd assume all the serial gpio controller has >> this "flaw". Simply because a register write won't block until the >> value is shifted out to the shift register and actualy loaded by >> strobing the load signal. It just depends on your burst setting >> (even with bursts off, and clocking all the time) on how large >> the delay is. So you might or might not notice it on a board. .. here -michael