Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:413:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 19csp53176pxp; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 21:10:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzG5F1PTNXpXxUhHsn+2HXcgKuVyhuOr5SEuYJabgQHPoFsOgIHvGJmLDpuzc4mmd1nuMKc X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6e24:b0:6d9:43f1:d3ce with SMTP id sd36-20020a1709076e2400b006d943f1d3cemr1584571ejc.166.1646457051512; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 21:10:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1646457051; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rFEqyhpdD3rabW4yIByiJH8kyx7T1cCMvYAjNEfjKw4Vy9U1fBooPyPXj4w2K4xYKd TlgTmBRluPvzm8JEiW/jobIpzuVaCzU9Oh31AncSRx4+CHm55ezd6PRjHwsj7nmq+oHf RkXG8s6LuFJz5SySOfiXTqXkq4ZtRcf2HaR2O7JZ6dDmYQqM/op/SqcsKrI1Qo25ZYvJ HyWWy5hODHh+ja23LxFWPPS4AWiI7f6+3H704b+xqaHfzVPrNXf107Zb4IY6bCteiTDI sI2fLGlxIWht3UuqYxc1iB5B63sANDoPvpOg1GNiCp299X6SXJqA5TnP4ntTLl7bTkeD Km3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:references:message-id:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=mJWJFr2xwIdcBLgWFleFF/ItCGiD5KO4oeAEsg0YmsE=; b=i61jX+5CFSI4YhQq3lNi8UppGeLk69T9qUiBEIOmMqhYIf1ThZNVKep1L+KlFy8ne4 zZAMPCMiqKnRpTZ4ME2iCaJUpHlL1Q7hGgIsuoMCShAanBP+gvIKi+UsbmQyjz+hD7a6 uGYrWw1gOVlYS+pKH8jIs+FWjXaQ//KK3Zqpj/GGh1ziQdUWdxkqK2Y3X0Altg1Uemwg m7dlNOqwsA9mUu+0iTDoTYSpw3pa28hUhF9C+yJDs2ikKD8OfSR6qetOxMjwGYngCMdN jkswqJ4HLaDzgfsx2lZjbIJusjCGS67AB5z9/48BNXN5m5YJeoLTX7P/57CdAsTnG0Dh IxBw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=D7dROpaZ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o15-20020a509b0f000000b00415d59918cesi6035738edi.81.2022.03.04.21.10.29; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 21:10:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=D7dROpaZ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230495AbiCEDdu (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 4 Mar 2022 22:33:50 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51642 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229486AbiCEDdt (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2022 22:33:49 -0500 Received: from wnew1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wnew1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.26]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58F3B1DB3C6; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 19:32:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailnew.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFE32B00158; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 22:32:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 04 Mar 2022 22:32:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=mJWJFr2xwIdcBLgWF leFF/ItCGiD5KO4oeAEsg0YmsE=; b=D7dROpaZ9IbFQXnayqKtFMyokt2JpYSXI Qx18D70ZW82wYhb+b/ovkqX1k86TG//9znkFpTfqH4waMn2MPBNhFIDYa4hQUdav cZXuGuHA/HT/+t9QCCsJZjE4EyP4y2QZxpUqgly1NAfZeL/db/lpqThv3n6mBnj3 14haI1vN8PtMIHYtINe6C4B9sxakA5n+XtDx0kD1ETXTRfQ5b/0EQuK78ISraSHQ TKGGASOEEB9Yk3OBwRpaDoDAPN1lwKx69dTTGc4ZtB9sLQP8V51PCwqY44fo4pYm sfhqI7j8i/BPexSZu65cLnFe3VMZMUmkQNvn5MbbTyj16Ubv+tyEg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddruddtledgheejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffujgfkfhggtgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhephfhinhhnucfv hhgrihhnuceofhhthhgrihhnsehlihhnuhigqdhmieekkhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepffduhfegfedvieetudfgleeugeehkeekfeevfffhieevteelvdfhtdevffet uedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepfh hthhgrihhnsehlihhnuhigqdhmieekkhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 22:32:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 14:32:53 +1100 (AEDT) From: Finn Thain To: Joe Perches cc: Miguel Ojeda , Tom Rix , Konrad Wilhelm Kleine , Bart Van Assche , kashyap.desai@broadcom.com, sumit.saxena@broadcom.com, shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com, scsi , linux-kernel , llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid: cleanup formatting of megaraid In-Reply-To: <451bb2c394b05928c815f1eb349a1281a687a608.camel@perches.com> Message-ID: <80717e6-16ac-56b2-bf12-683d44f4743d@linux-m68k.org> References: <20220127151945.1244439-1-trix@redhat.com> <0adde369-3fd7-3608-594c-d199cce3c936@redhat.com> <46441b86-1d19-5eb4-0013-db1c63a9b0a5@redhat.com> <8dd05afd-0bb9-c91b-6393-aff69f1363e1@redhat.com> <233660d0-1dee-7d80-1581-2e6845bf7689@linux-m68k.org> <95f5be1d-f5f3-478-5ccb-76556a41de78@linux-m68k.org> <7368bc3ea6dece01004c3e0c194abb0d26d4932b.camel@perches.com> <9dc86e74-7741-bb8e-bbad-ae96cebaaebc@redhat.com> <451bb2c394b05928c815f1eb349a1281a687a608.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 4 Mar 2022, Joe Perches wrote: > > Is that statement really disputable? > If there was such a thing as an indisputable statement, a set of universally accepted style rules would soon follow, I suspect. ... > > There is no "one true editor". > There will not be "one true source code formatter" either. > It only has to be sufficiently good that it produces a consensus.