Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:413:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 19csp302449pxp; Sat, 5 Mar 2022 04:47:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzleqoOHn9LxRvXiCQRjtZG5SDLX2KgIwJj3A5oqYt/Bh29+t0n7YGkJH+XGnOn/6wUpVkO X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:be0d:b0:151:a86f:e3f3 with SMTP id r13-20020a170902be0d00b00151a86fe3f3mr3287335pls.37.1646484468272; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 04:47:48 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1646484468; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SAoXC2OUiLmRlwU1tLFBzUobqmeeHFaec7F+logmnk5sCf1yhyC3FLGRmPc3qnRvXL 9SKSi2kN1bkDj6Vt8ct9udpaSjlZ0ybF6MvWaD77jzALcdtQihFYou0vtQGnaHT+QLiJ rkBaWv9PsWsriDUZoQj6ANJCFe64XWMFqSZnZuzuZVUe8JK8NgDHaTOTFQI2Mctoz8ep YnL5EL9ZMu8BPiV7DnsCuzoektEZD/LlzH1aNypLxtM1WwNgTDAvi44TdZ3t9Co8vlH4 YWpDKJjXZEMNmC3t1HImpX6ygmGr22zHvp9AppAO3HYfPlk5Te4awOJrrq0alBFrQx8t zUhA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=WRhUCDi8ybKVmqcvMo1zo6OoakRiXNlP5njWqCl1xfg=; b=eGHDdoXAB/9ZVWRpPy+4/73iTa1+yCeXwToUb44Xa1KvYVfJmFtWjx6nPnTl/Ubqka u9WG2IT1Q3MDClWj1X4XSP/cnRYwX4uf2L2b3CJRtfs2ZXyeJSlxT3q+4CtKzb6e9uZ6 JtqXSz3K7kuz4KtsH658jjUFjETffADvO/9Rwd4Sta0M9tRXziT1xVpMl5xgL8kcRrhx +SVXg68udfluHPq6sCP4NYMpz7OHpypLSCsKjKVIBQYztdWiCbwJz/WfPaWNrskn2Dcn ybbt4bo23w8Zt6MXs3jyyXc+CREtXjjcyrQoCvE8fREN5gUS62uiuXBqmr1wsa956hz1 yuHg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@bytedance-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=w1lu7a7f; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=bytedance.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s12-20020a17090ad48c00b001bd14e01f31si2177077pju.31.2022.03.05.04.47.08; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 04:47:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@bytedance-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=w1lu7a7f; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=bytedance.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230248AbiCEA6m (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 4 Mar 2022 19:58:42 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37860 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229627AbiCEA6l (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2022 19:58:41 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D372111A3E for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 16:57:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id v1-20020a17090a088100b001bf25f97c6eso2500329pjc.0 for ; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 16:57:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bytedance-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WRhUCDi8ybKVmqcvMo1zo6OoakRiXNlP5njWqCl1xfg=; b=w1lu7a7fOkmK0cE3K0hXYFrEt75zDPhimAc2VjIptJM/NHsh2psv5ry1FxXMuJ5M+u rAsfnZKjb3E5QoDqk88O37yvrkLl/hFaukVxQTL2tSAkwdy+AjzvGBOHLqI7oAV1RuX4 /E7J8OLK4aaace5w4I9EX4qqgLpJXaEYpUQlXYM0XcLGi2DLtS4nN1J9tr31ObztZA+6 X99AMSmWJuDkHka9zhMIyghfS9IPkUhhXwML3vkz9aJVp6t3/65ER6bet3dCJToIBdvS 06a3dh2iCYyAsT7ZQU28/Qv657/Rnx1H8Vt63TTWjxFAsnz2LndFnS+wIzjliPvzSFnP y+zA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WRhUCDi8ybKVmqcvMo1zo6OoakRiXNlP5njWqCl1xfg=; b=HV46odLO8tzX9wwszwHde6v4vDEkH7lnHkciGiZG0H7Kj6GBFT8Uk8OD3jyANr/R5+ rmRh2ZkAAFaK7DVQ1T6eim4T4Ah2gzoA9+2k/bXZBlrkwamXNwgrkToKxeZB/d19wRdQ 9iknhsMkAKly4RGxUSeX3svwIRsFmPb0xjRxvUZ/qedKGmC5WNzHf3oRhcsw0kMcxtTE 4v8HXKitxlmRDk5vG8NRCI6EBir7+Wj6Dxsuzjbyq41Qo/eNZxVy7Vcq/Db0Y2LVeMxu 1pPe9KEdiiMmMorHvrO+MD8bLpam4B0yAvdjZdunPE4amwp1yOooXhTOoVHF0voCVtPO yhMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533aKWUN7YwThtKIXbjsDmC+NIBo80FgDO0ivhFbkHwYDSnQZH40 +sGHLv9zGJiKL4YefVLTV3o3Gg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:120c:b0:14f:3f4a:f832 with SMTP id l12-20020a170903120c00b0014f3f4af832mr1248279plh.157.1646441871200; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 16:57:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.255.166.9] ([139.177.225.229]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u7-20020a056a00158700b004f6ae198a56sm4334801pfk.9.2022.03.04.16.57.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Mar 2022 16:57:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4d828b01-b636-e0b8-0241-656331f27de4@bytedance.com> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 08:57:43 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Subject: Re: [External] Re: [next] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage : include/linux/cgroup.h:494 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage Content-Language: en-US To: Zhouyi Zhou , "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Naresh Kamboju , Linux-Next Mailing List , open list , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, rcu , Stephen Rothwell , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon References: <20220304194408.GP4285@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> From: Chengming Zhou In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,NICE_REPLY_A,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2022/3/5 4:28 上午, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > Hi Paul > > Yes, your suggestion works! > Thank you for your guidance, this is the first time I ever did a > bisection, I gained greatly during this process! Hi Zhouyi, thanks for the bisection test. Could this patch solve RCU warning? I just tested on my machine and there is no RCU warning any more. diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h index 1e356c222756..0d1ada8968d7 100644 --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h @@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ extern struct mutex cgroup_mutex; extern spinlock_t css_set_lock; #define task_css_set_check(task, __c) \ rcu_dereference_check((task)->cgroups, \ + rcu_read_lock_sched_held() || \ lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex) || \ lockdep_is_held(&css_set_lock) || \ ((task)->flags & PF_EXITING) || (__c)) Thanks. > > On Sat, Mar 5, 2022 at 3:44 AM Paul E. McKenney wrote: >> >> On Sat, Mar 05, 2022 at 03:38:33AM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I can reproduce these warnings on my X86 VM. >>> Following the my backtrace: >>> >>> (gdb) bt >>> #0 lockdep_rcu_suspicious (file=file@entry=0xffffffff825ea8ff >>> "include/linux/cgroup.h", line=line@entry=494, >>> s=s@entry=0xffffffff825c5c50 "suspicious rcu_dereference_check() >>> usage") at ./arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:15 >>> #1 0xffffffff81183103 in task_css (subsys_id=2, >>> task=0xffff888100804080) at ./include/linux/cgroup.h:494 >>> #2 task_ca (tsk=0xffff888100804080) at kernel/sched/cpuacct.c:40 >>> #3 cpuacct_charge (tsk=tsk@entry=0xffff888100804080, >>> cputime=cputime@entry=3344803) at kernel/sched/cpuacct.c:342 >>> #4 0xffffffff81162655 in cgroup_account_cputime (delta_exec=3344803, >>> task=0xffff888100804080) at ./include/linux/cgroup.h:792 >>> #5 update_curr (cfs_rq=cfs_rq@entry=0xffff88813b63f500) at >>> kernel/sched/fair.c:907 >>> #6 0xffffffff81164797 in dequeue_entity (flags=10, >>> se=0xffff888100804100, cfs_rq=0xffff88813b63f500) at >>> kernel/sched/fair.c:5771 >>> #7 dequeue_task_fair (rq=0xffff88813b63f440, p=0xffff888100804080, >>> flags=10) at kernel/sched/fair.c:5771 >>> #8 0xffffffff8115412a in dequeue_task (flags=10, >>> p=0xffff888100804080, rq=0xffff88813b63f440) at >>> kernel/sched/core.c:2019 >>> #9 __do_set_cpus_allowed (p=0xffff888100804080, >>> new_mask=0xffffffff831b4d40 , flags=0) at >>> kernel/sched/core.c:2508 >>> #10 0xffffffff811564ca in __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked >>> (p=p@entry=0xffff888100804080, >>> new_mask=new_mask@entry=0xffffffff831b4d40 , >>> flags=flags@entry=0, rq=0xffff88813b63f440, >>> rf=rf@entry=0xffffc9000012bee8) at kernel/sched/core.c:2841 >>> #11 0xffffffff81156573 in __set_cpus_allowed_ptr >>> (p=p@entry=0xffff888100804080, new_mask=0xffffffff831b4d40 >>> , flags=flags@entry=0) >>> at kernel/sched/core.c:2874 >>> #12 0xffffffff8115664c in set_cpus_allowed_ptr >>> (p=p@entry=0xffff888100804080, new_mask=) at >>> kernel/sched/core.c:2879 >>> #13 0xffffffff81144676 in kthreadd (unused=) at >>> kernel/kthread.c:724 >>> #14 0xffffffff810019df in ret_from_fork () at arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 >>> #15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () >>> >>> Do the warnings have something to do with commit >>> dc6e0818bc9a0336d9accf3ea35d146d72aa7a18 (sched/cpuacct: Optimize away >>> RCU read lock) ? >> >> If you have not already done so, could you please try running on this >> commit and then on the commit immediately preceding it? Just as a >> authoritative way to answer your question. ;-) >> >> Thanx, Paul >> > git reset --hard dc6e0818bc9a0336d9accf3ea35d146d72aa7a18 > make -j 16 bindeb-pkg > there are RCU WARNINGs: > http://154.223.142.244/logs/20220305/log.dc6e0818bc9a0336d9accf3ea35d146d72aa7a18.txt > > then I running on the commit immediately preceding it > git reset --hard 248cc9993d1cc12b8e9ed716cc3fc09f6c3517dd > make -j 16 bindeb-pkg > the WARNINGs are gone with the wind ;-) > http://154.223.142.244/logs/20220305/log.248cc9993d1cc12b8e9ed716cc3fc09f6c3517dd.txt > > Many thanks > Zhouyi >>> Many thanks >>> Zhouyi >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 10:43 PM Naresh Kamboju >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> While booting x86_64 with linux next-20220304 kernel the following kernel >>>> warning reported [1]. >>>> >>>> metadata: >>>> git_ref: master >>>> git_repo: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/next/linux-next >>>> git_sha: 6d284ba80c0c485bcaa7bdf67f232d572640edc4 >>>> git_describe: next-20220304 >>>> kernel-config: https://builds.tuxbuild.com/25uuYdm2vTO275aZ3IewZY5sKbU/config >>>> >>>> >>>> warning log: >>>> --------- >>>> [ 1.482171] MDS: Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers >>>> [ 1.485680] Freeing SMP alternatives memory: 52K >>>> [ 1.487341] >>>> [ 1.488169] ============================= >>>> [ 1.488169] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage >>>> [ 1.488169] 5.17.0-rc6-next-20220304 #1 Not tainted >>>> [ 1.488169] ----------------------------- >>>> [ 1.488169] include/linux/cgroup.h:494 suspicious >>>> rcu_dereference_check() usage! >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] other info that might help us debug this: >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1 >>>> [ 1.488169] 2 locks held by kthreadd/2: >>>> [ 1.488169] #0: ffff9ba440352330 (&p->pi_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: >>>> task_rq_lock+0x2e/0x130 >>>> [ 1.488169] #1: ffff9ba7a7a2d058 (&rq->__lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: >>>> task_rq_lock+0x5d/0x130 >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] stack backtrace: >>>> [ 1.488169] CPU: 0 PID: 2 Comm: kthreadd Not tainted >>>> 5.17.0-rc6-next-20220304 #1 >>>> [ 1.488169] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS >>>> 2.5 11/26/2020 >>>> [ 1.488169] Call Trace: >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x5e >>>> [ 1.488169] dump_stack+0x10/0x12 >>>> [ 1.488169] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xed/0xf8 >>>> [ 1.488169] cpuacct_charge+0x10c/0x120 >>>> [ 1.488169] update_curr+0x165/0x340 >>>> [ 1.488169] dequeue_entity+0x23/0x430 >>>> [ 1.488169] dequeue_task_fair+0xba/0x3b0 >>>> [ 1.488169] __do_set_cpus_allowed+0xca/0x2c0 >>>> [ 1.488169] __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x128/0x1b0 >>>> [ 1.488169] set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x43/0x70 >>>> [ 1.488169] kthreadd+0x49/0x230 >>>> [ 1.488169] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0x30/0x30 >>>> [ 1.488169] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] ============================= >>>> [ 1.488169] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage >>>> [ 1.488169] 5.17.0-rc6-next-20220304 #1 Not tainted >>>> [ 1.488169] ----------------------------- >>>> [ 1.488169] include/linux/cgroup.h:481 suspicious >>>> rcu_dereference_check() usage! >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] other info that might help us debug this: >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1 >>>> [ 1.488169] 2 locks held by kthreadd/2: >>>> [ 1.488169] #0: ffff9ba440352330 (&p->pi_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: >>>> task_rq_lock+0x2e/0x130 >>>> [ 1.488169] #1: ffff9ba7a7a2d058 (&rq->__lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: >>>> task_rq_lock+0x5d/0x130 >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] stack backtrace: >>>> [ 1.488169] CPU: 0 PID: 2 Comm: kthreadd Not tainted >>>> 5.17.0-rc6-next-20220304 #1 >>>> [ 1.488169] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS >>>> 2.5 11/26/2020 >>>> [ 1.488169] Call Trace: >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x5e >>>> [ 1.488169] dump_stack+0x10/0x12 >>>> [ 1.488169] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xed/0xf8 >>>> [ 1.488169] update_curr+0x2b7/0x340 >>>> [ 1.488169] dequeue_entity+0x23/0x430 >>>> [ 1.488169] dequeue_task_fair+0xba/0x3b0 >>>> [ 1.488169] __do_set_cpus_allowed+0xca/0x2c0 >>>> [ 1.488169] __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x128/0x1b0 >>>> [ 1.488169] set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x43/0x70 >>>> [ 1.488169] kthreadd+0x49/0x230 >>>> [ 1.488169] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0x30/0x30 >>>> [ 1.488169] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] ============================= >>>> [ 1.488169] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage >>>> [ 1.488169] 5.17.0-rc6-next-20220304 #1 Not tainted >>>> [ 1.488169] ----------------------------- >>>> [ 1.488169] include/linux/cgroup.h:481 suspicious >>>> rcu_dereference_check() usage! >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] other info that might help us debug this: >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1 >>>> [ 1.488169] no locks held by kthreadd/2. >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] stack backtrace: >>>> [ 1.488169] CPU: 0 PID: 2 Comm: kthreadd Not tainted >>>> 5.17.0-rc6-next-20220304 #1 >>>> [ 1.488169] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS >>>> 2.5 11/26/2020 >>>> [ 1.488169] Call Trace: >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x5e >>>> [ 1.488169] dump_stack+0x10/0x12 >>>> [ 1.488169] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xed/0xf8 >>>> [ 1.488169] account_system_index_time+0x127/0x130 >>>> [ 1.488169] account_system_time+0x50/0x60 >>>> [ 1.488169] account_process_tick+0x59/0x80 >>>> [ 1.488169] update_process_times+0x58/0xe0 >>>> [ 1.488169] tick_periodic+0x37/0xf0 >>>> [ 1.488169] tick_handle_periodic+0x24/0x70 >>>> [ 1.488169] timer_interrupt+0x18/0x20 >>>> [ 1.488169] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x95/0x2f0 >>>> [ 1.488169] handle_irq_event+0x39/0x80 >>>> [ 1.488169] handle_edge_irq+0xa4/0x240 >>>> [ 1.488169] __common_interrupt+0x8d/0x170 >>>> [ 1.488169] common_interrupt+0xbd/0xe0 >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.488169] asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40 >>>> [ 1.488169] RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x37/0x60 >>>> [ 1.488169] Code: fc 48 83 c7 18 53 48 89 f3 48 8b 75 08 e8 21 83 >>>> ed fe 4c 89 e7 e8 19 b0 ed fe 80 e7 02 74 06 e8 6f 77 fa fe fb bf 01 >>>> 00 00 00 24 6b e9 fe 65 8b 05 bd e1 28 66 85 c0 74 05 5b 41 5c 5d >>>> c3 0f >>>> [ 1.488169] RSP: 0000:ffffb75b0002fd50 EFLAGS: 00000202 >>>> [ 1.488169] RAX: 0000000000000007 RBX: 0000000000000246 RCX: 0000000000000000 >>>> [ 1.488169] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff9a800a7c RDI: 0000000000000001 >>>> [ 1.488169] RBP: ffffb75b0002fd60 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001 >>>> [ 1.488169] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9ba440352318 >>>> [ 1.488169] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff9ba7a7a2d040 >>>> [ 1.488169] affine_move_task+0x2d4/0x5d0 >>>> [ 1.488169] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20 >>>> [ 1.488169] ? lock_is_held_type+0xdd/0x130 >>>> [ 1.488169] ? enqueue_entity+0x1b8/0x520 >>>> [ 1.488169] __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x15c/0x1b0 >>>> [ 1.488169] set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x43/0x70 >>>> [ 1.488169] kthreadd+0x49/0x230 >>>> [ 1.488169] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0x30/0x30 >>>> [ 1.488169] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 >>>> [ 1.488169] >>>> [ 1.489211] smpboot: Estimated ratio of average max frequency by >>>> base frequency (times 1024): 1126 >>>> [ 1.490189] smpboot: CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1220 v6 @ >>>> 3.00GHz (family: 0x6, model: 0x9e, stepping: 0x9) >>>> [ 1.491635] cblist_init_generic: Setting adjustable number of >>>> callback queues. >>>> [ 1.492171] cblist_init_generic: Setting shift to 2 and lim to 1. >>>> [ 1.493226] cblist_init_generic: Setting shift to 2 and lim to 1. >>>> [ 1.494226] cblist_init_generic: Setting shift to 2 and lim to 1. >>>> [ 1.495219] Running RCU-tasks wait API self tests >>>> [ 1.598317] Performance Events: PEBS fmt3+, Skylake events, 32-deep >>>> LBR, full-width counters, Intel PMU driver. >>>> [ 1.599176] ... version: 4 >>>> [ 1.600171] ... bit width: 48 >>>> [ 1.601171] ... generic registers: 8 >>>> [ 1.602171] ... value mask: 0000ffffffffffff >>>> [ 1.603171] ... max period: 00007fffffffffff >>>> [ 1.604176] ... fixed-purpose events: 3 >>>> [ 1.605171] ... event mask: 00000007000000ff >>>> [ 1.606188] Callback from call_rcu_tasks_trace() invoked. >>>> [ 1.607450] rcu: Hierarchical SRCU implementation. >>>> [ 1.608310] >>>> [ 1.609169] ============================= >>>> [ 1.609169] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage >>>> [ 1.609169] 5.17.0-rc6-next-20220304 #1 Not tainted >>>> [ 1.609169] ----------------------------- >>>> [ 1.609169] include/linux/cgroup.h:481 suspicious >>>> rcu_dereference_check() usage! >>>> [ 1.609169] >>>> [ 1.609169] other info that might help us debug this: >>>> [ 1.609169] >>>> [ 1.609169] >>>> [ 1.609169] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1 >>>> [ 1.609169] 1 lock held by migration/0/17: >>>> [ 1.609169] #0: ffff9ba7a7a2d058 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: >>>> __schedule+0x12d/0xcb0 >>>> [ 1.609169] >>>> [ 1.609169] stack backtrace: >>>> [ 1.609169] CPU: 0 PID: 17 Comm: migration/0 Not tainted >>>> 5.17.0-rc6-next-20220304 #1 >>>> [ 1.609169] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS >>>> 2.5 11/26/2020 >>>> [ 1.609169] Stopper: 0x0 <- 0x0 >>>> [ 1.609169] Call Trace: >>>> [ 1.609169] >>>> [ 1.609169] dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x5e >>>> [ 1.609169] dump_stack+0x10/0x12 >>>> [ 1.609169] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xed/0xf8 >>>> [ 1.609169] put_prev_task_stop+0x1dc/0x240 >>>> [ 1.609169] __schedule+0x751/0xcb0 >>>> [ 1.609169] ? trace_preempt_off+0x29/0xc0 >>>> [ 1.609169] ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x33/0x290 >>>> [ 1.609169] schedule+0x58/0xc0 >>>> [ 1.609169] smpboot_thread_fn+0xec/0x290 >>>> [ 1.609169] ? sort_range+0x30/0x30 >>>> [ 1.609169] kthread+0x107/0x130 >>>> [ 1.609169] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 >>>> [ 1.609169] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 >>>> [ 1.609169] >>>> [ 1.610276] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ... >>>> [ 1.611596] x86: Booting SMP configuration: >>>> [ 1.612179] .... node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3 >>>> [ 1.614396] smp: Brought up 1 node, 4 CPUs >>>> >>>> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Linaro LKFT >>>> https://lkft.linaro.org >>>> >>>> [1] https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20220304/testrun/8235955/suite/linux-log-parser/test/check-kernel-warning-4655400/log