Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <9be81980b1849dc60b46ad0672b667b6b5365f2d.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] bpf-lsm: Extend interoperability with IMA
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>, shuah@kernel.org,
        ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
        yhs@fb.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, revest@chromium.org,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc:     linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Sun, 06 Mar 2022 14:23:37 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20220302111404.193900-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
References: <20220302111404.193900-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2022-03-02 at 12:13 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> Extend the interoperability with IMA, to give wider flexibility for the
> implementation of integrity-focused LSMs based on eBPF.
> 
> Patch 1 fixes some style issues.
> 
> Patches 2-6 give the ability to eBPF-based LSMs to take advantage of the
> measurement capability of IMA without needing to setup a policy in IMA
> (those LSMs might implement the policy capability themselves).
> 
> Patches 7-9 allow eBPF-based LSMs to evaluate files read by the kernel.

The tests seem to only work when neither a builtin IMA policy or a
custom policy is previously loaded.

thanks,

Mimi