Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 7 Mar 2022 11:22:16 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     zhanglianjie <zhanglianjie@uniontech.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: unify the show() and store() styles of attr
Message-ID: <20220307055216.gh3aiivz7o3tvomr@vireshk-i7>
References: <20220306021250.64315-1-zhanglianjie@uniontech.com>
 <20220307053931.kkhnxrujljynp5cz@vireshk-i7>
 <62259d22.1c69fb81.5ba55.5efaSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <62259d22.1c69fb81.5ba55.5efaSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 07-03-22, 13:50, zhanglianjie wrote:
> Usually /sys directory under the file, the corresponding Attribute contains
> .show and .store, and their naming style is filename_show() and
> filename_store(). But all naming style in 'cpufreq' is show_filename() and
> store_filename(), So you need to change naming style.

This is something that is present within the kernel and not exposed to
userspace. I don't see why we would need to make this change and what
good it brings.

I would have supported this if cpufreq itself had different names, but
for this one, No.

-- 
viresh