Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 05:12:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 05:11:53 -0500 Received: from dmb001.rug.ac.be ([157.193.78.1]:45200 "HELO dmb.rug.ac.be") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 05:11:36 -0500 Message-ID: <3C021570.4000603@dmb.rug.ac.be> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:12:00 +0100 From: Didier Moens Organization: RUG/VIB - Dept. Molecular Biology User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Fwd: Re: OOPS in agpgart (2.4.13, 2.4.15pre7)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: >On Sun, 25 Nov 2001 15:09:13 +0100 >Didier Moens wrote: > >>Dear, >> >>Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: >> >>> >>>Hello Marcelo, >>> >>>I tried to find the current maintainer of agpgart module, but couldn't >>>find any in the MAINTAINERS list. Who is it? >>>I obviously could fix the oops, but I would need some input on how >>>I830M chipset looks like on a working config to further investigate >>>Didiers problem. >>>Any hints? >>> >>>Regards, >>>Stephan >>> >>> >>Anything I can do to help out ? >> > >Hm, well if you can get your hands on another box with i830, another lspci >output would be of interest. > Examining the code : if (i810_dev == NULL) { printk(KERN_ERR PFX "agpgart: Detected an " "Intel i815, but could not find the" " secondary device. Assuming a " "non-integrated video card.\n"); break; This leads me to believe the "secondary device" could be the integrated graphics component on the i810/815. As the i830M doesn't have one (the i830MG does), I suppose this could lead to the aforementioned error message, and hence failure of the agpgart modprobe ? Could it be that one has to differentiate between i830MG (secondary device, and hence analoguous to i810/i815) and i830M (no secondary device, and possibly analoguous to i830/i840/i845/... : no check for 2nd device needed ) ? Offcourse, I could be utterly wrong. Regards, Didier - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/