Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:413:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 19csp2848383pxp; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 03:09:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1KjOIW8v9Pnw5YcdJfeHqsTkESAp0sDUMLTYDtEnlevuYYs7cFs3LpZueemi/KirX/ZI2 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8b13:0:b0:4f0:f393:ec42 with SMTP id f19-20020aa78b13000000b004f0f393ec42mr17685056pfd.6.1646737785949; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 03:09:45 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1646737785; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tRMaE0YKPuqTH9T3wx3w5xlgob53CAgZUlDk/0p+OZLYre8We5zcdNfv5NPfs5t6eF Dal8m6tMA/sNnSuC0dAJp2Z8E9Vzvt14fHifn6uWvSrOFjqCWCmBLhEAdEdjQ8KU+CgS 0RlGJZZdv1UBqLkkza2L5jd1dDko/8trAqT+fJsJJhsjuoZLH7/9psc9xEf96VFM3YPh fv6qkqGs0VvjORcKk0+AmO/0uT9i9yGm1WeDYIXW16z4ADSfeaslSelUxHFJKOAF7jv7 UoZ9q5L9FbOf1MmM4WJb0XG2qN/p7P+FnotMIddwjVZ0dUThJzERJk6JQkn5MwR4QSS7 20eQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:to:content-language:subject:cc:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=AkPdA1FPMap1jBxSRxJ0aKix0/rgm714ffUUSRwRp3A=; b=Qgn2QCfuR8AdOmzlyq+QiTuCBKaxAcSOw/4e3yctR0R6cu8g04qClOseYAHAPZIiwM m2ph7Z1s3ju/C9/ptgfS2hnhaPfMbdgXig5Akwta3oJP5QRb4i6+tmaEmQ2NCO+WsdcU kHz3N5Eo2LgtqSaCvtu9mzd7i9S/xX8V2pvm6IdbqOUrWpMPcfxQIkjmhJZ1MoDt0TmJ e89sm1PL5d7kFIFmZ2dNWA6t42sqL9SQkRdnzlpLjhH6ZTcC1CVPL3fZHRE20a77Nncq qWNYyyCrikRtkY5OOiHBos7GzbfBwkcitiOZjz5KHF1ToJpigoHTtbW58zDKbGgM50nj UKJQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="J/D3yqrM"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l21-20020a056a0016d500b004f23eb797a1si16666185pfc.112.2022.03.08.03.09.31; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 03:09:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="J/D3yqrM"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242792AbiCHAcV (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 7 Mar 2022 19:32:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39586 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230263AbiCHAcT (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2022 19:32:19 -0500 Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3AB112ADA; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 16:31:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1646699483; x=1678235483; h=message-id:date:mime-version:cc:subject:to:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oSu0Z2jGUkfhbuVOaedzXc4LteEqQxU2xU+auVYA8/8=; b=J/D3yqrMTipJDADD0loQoVIfJnWEePK9vKs2mESF8VeGelRWLWv0S3yC VyU94kbCuC+og0HV5nYYvfGwVRr3Gceie3RhPJxB1YWh09CKrlngG09CT MSVUDCF/vxuQSHknRfNDjYJRMPN7eO0qN3w9nZsd6n+9ldZ5xZHhiAFAd xGwu0KG0fvjkWYfZnms0I17ugdiqfdL5BM/Pq1Ex9x7beyCbINASL3Zin mYgOjOUiwaw6zI3JtPEsg9HXh+f/O1UXyKpK3KSc28srjnPl5OYyITci+ znHh/S0KVGrrOvUJG0/yk94kkXkPjNVmqUxi/in///ieoabcBd91ip3S5 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10279"; a="235154024" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,163,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="235154024" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Mar 2022 16:31:23 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,163,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="711324392" Received: from blu2-mobl3.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.209.195]) ([10.254.209.195]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Mar 2022 16:31:16 -0800 Message-ID: <5fb85230-466c-9615-0867-bb17cab34be5@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 08:31:14 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.2 Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Chaitanya Kulkarni , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Stuart Yoder , rafael@kernel.org, David Airlie , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Hunter , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Thierry Reding , Jacob jun Pan , Daniel Vetter , Diana Craciun , Dan Williams , Li Yang , Will Deacon , Dmitry Osipenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/11] iommu: Add DMA ownership management interfaces Content-Language: en-US To: eric.auger@redhat.com, Robin Murphy , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Joerg Roedel , Alex Williamson , Bjorn Helgaas , Jason Gunthorpe , Christoph Hellwig , Kevin Tian , Ashok Raj References: <20220228005056.599595-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20220228005056.599595-2-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <7a3dc977-0c5f-6d88-6d3a-8e49bc717690@linux.intel.com> <1648bc97-a0d3-4051-58d0-e24fa9e9d183@arm.com> <350a8e09-08a9-082b-3ad1-b711c7d98d73@redhat.com> From: Lu Baolu In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2022/3/7 20:42, Eric Auger wrote: > Hi Lu, > > On 3/7/22 4:27 AM, Lu Baolu wrote: >> Hi Robin, >> >> On 3/4/22 10:10 PM, Robin Murphy wrote: >>> On 2022-03-04 13:55, Eric Auger wrote: >>>> Hi Robin, >>>> >>>> On 3/4/22 1:22 PM, Robin Murphy wrote: >>>>> On 2022-03-04 10:43, Lu Baolu wrote: >>>>>> Hi Eric, >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2022/3/4 18:34, Eric Auger wrote: >>>>>>> I hit a WARN_ON() when unbinding an e1000e driver just after boot: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> sudo modprobe -v vfio-pci >>>>>>> echo vfio-pci | sudo tee -a >>>>>>> /sys/bus/pci/devices/0004:01:00.0/driver_override >>>>>>> vfio-pci >>>>>>> echo 0004:01:00.0 | sudo tee -a  /sys/bus/pci/drivers/e1000e/unbind >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [  390.042811] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>>>>>> [  390.046468] WARNING: CPU: 42 PID: 5589 at >>>>>>> drivers/iommu/iommu.c:3123 >>>>>>> iommu_device_unuse_default_domain+0x68/0x100 >>>>>>> [  390.056710] Modules linked in: vfio_pci vfio_pci_core vfio_virqfd >>>>>>> vfio_iommu_type1 vfio xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack >>>>>>> ipt_REJECT >>>>>>> nf_reject_ipv4 nft_compat nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack >>>>>>> nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_tables nfnetlink bridge stp llc >>>>>>> rfkill >>>>>>> sunrpc vfat fat mlx5_ib ib_uverbs ib_core acpi_ipmi ipmi_ssif >>>>>>> ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler cppc_cpufreq drm xfs libcrc32c >>>>>>> mlx5_core sg >>>>>>> mlxfw crct10dif_ce tls ghash_ce sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce >>>>>>> sbsa_gwdt >>>>>>> e1000e psample sdhci_acpi ahci_platform sdhci libahci_platform >>>>>>> qcom_emac >>>>>>> mmc_core hdma hdma_mgmt dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod fuse >>>>>>> [  390.110618] CPU: 42 PID: 5589 Comm: tee Kdump: loaded Not tainted >>>>>>> 5.17.0-rc4-lu-v7-official+ #24 >>>>>>> [  390.119384] Hardware name: WIWYNN QDF2400 Reference Evaluation >>>>>>> Platform CV90-LA115-P120/QDF2400 Customer Reference Board, BIOS >>>>>>> 0ACJA570 >>>>>>> 11/05/2018 >>>>>>> [  390.132492] pstate: a0400005 (NzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS >>>>>>> BTYPE=--) >>>>>>> [  390.139436] pc : iommu_device_unuse_default_domain+0x68/0x100 >>>>>>> [  390.145165] lr : iommu_device_unuse_default_domain+0x38/0x100 >>>>>>> [  390.150894] sp : ffff80000fbb3bc0 >>>>>>> [  390.154193] x29: ffff80000fbb3bc0 x28: ffff03c0cf6b2400 x27: >>>>>>> 0000000000000000 >>>>>>> [  390.161311] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: >>>>>>> ffff03c0c7cc5720 >>>>>>> [  390.168429] x23: ffff03c0c2b9d150 x22: ffffb4e61df223f8 x21: >>>>>>> ffffb4e61df223f8 >>>>>>> [  390.175547] x20: ffff03c7c03c3758 x19: ffff03c7c03c3700 x18: >>>>>>> 0000000000000000 >>>>>>> [  390.182665] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: >>>>>>> 0000000000000000 >>>>>>> [  390.189783] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000030 x12: >>>>>>> ffff03c0d519cd80 >>>>>>> [  390.196901] x11: 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f x10: 0000000000000dc0 x9 : >>>>>>> ffffb4e620b54f8c >>>>>>> [  390.204019] x8 : ffff03c0cf6b3220 x7 : ffff4ef132bba000 x6 : >>>>>>> 00000000000000ff >>>>>>> [  390.211137] x5 : ffff03c0c2b9f108 x4 : ffff03c0d51f6438 x3 : >>>>>>> 0000000000000000 >>>>>>> [  390.218255] x2 : ffff03c0cf6b2400 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : >>>>>>> 0000000000000000 >>>>>>> [  390.225374] Call trace: >>>>>>> [  390.227804]  iommu_device_unuse_default_domain+0x68/0x100 >>>>>>> [  390.233187]  pci_dma_cleanup+0x38/0x44 >>>>>>> [  390.236919]  __device_release_driver+0x1a8/0x260 >>>>>>> [  390.241519]  device_driver_detach+0x50/0xd0 >>>>>>> [  390.245686]  unbind_store+0xf8/0x120 >>>>>>> [  390.249245]  drv_attr_store+0x30/0x44 >>>>>>> [  390.252891]  sysfs_kf_write+0x50/0x60 >>>>>>> [  390.256537]  kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x134/0x1cc >>>>>>> [  390.260964]  new_sync_write+0xf0/0x18c >>>>>>> [  390.264696]  vfs_write+0x230/0x2d0 >>>>>>> [  390.268082]  ksys_write+0x74/0x100 >>>>>>> [  390.271467]  __arm64_sys_write+0x28/0x3c >>>>>>> [  390.275373]  invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x58/0xf0 >>>>>>> [  390.280061]  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x164 >>>>>>> [  390.284922]  do_el0_svc+0x34/0xcc >>>>>>> [  390.288221]  el0_svc+0x30/0x140 >>>>>>> [  390.291346]  el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa4/0x130 >>>>>>> [  390.295599]  el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 >>>>>>> [  390.299245] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I put some traces in the code and I can see that >>>>>>> iommu_device_use_default_domain() effectively is called on >>>>>>> 0004:01:00.0 e1000e device on pci_dma_configure() but at that time >>>>>>> the iommu group is NULL: >>>>>>> [   10.569427] e1000e 0004:01:00.0: ------ ENTRY pci_dma_configure >>>>>>> driver_managed_area=0 >>>>>>> [   10.569431] e1000e 0004:01:00.0: **** >>>>>>> iommu_device_use_default_domain ENTRY >>>>>>> [   10.569433] e1000e 0004:01:00.0: **** >>>>>>> iommu_device_use_default_domain no group >>>>>>> [   10.569435] e1000e 0004:01:00.0: pci_dma_configure >>>>>>> iommu_device_use_default_domain returned 0 >>>>>>> [   10.569492] e1000e 0004:01:00.0: Adding to iommu group 3 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ^^^the group is added after the >>>>>>> iommu_device_use_default_domain() call >>>>>>> So the group->owner_cnt is not incremented as expected. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for reporting this. Do you have any idea why the driver is >>>>>> loaded before iommu_probe_device()? >>>>> >>>>> Urgh, this is the horrible firmware-data-ordering thing again. The >>>>> stuff I've been saying about having to rework the whole .dma_configure >>>>> mechanism in the near future is to fix this properly. >>>>> >>>>> The summary is that in patch #4, calling >>>>> iommu_device_use_default_domain() *before* {of,acpi}_dma_configure is >>>>> currently a problem. As things stand, the IOMMU driver ignored the >>>>> initial iommu_probe_device() call when the device was added, since at >>>>> that point it had no fwspec yet. In this situation, >>>>> {of,acpi}_iommu_configure() are retriggering iommu_probe_device() >>>>> after the IOMMU driver has seen the firmware data via .of_xlate to >>>>> learn that it it actually responsible for the given device. >>>> >>>> thank you for providing the info. Hope this is something Lu can work >>>> around. >>> >>> Hopefully it's just a case of flipping the calls around, so that >>> iommu_use_default_domain() goes at the end, and calls >>> arch_teardown_dma_ops() if it fails. From a quick skim I *think* that >>> should still work out to the desired behaviour (or at least close >>> enough that we can move forward without a circular dependency between >>> fixes...) >> >> This is a reasonable solution to me. Thank you for the information and >> suggestion. >> >> Eric, I have updated the patch #4 and uploaded a new version here: >> >> https://github.com/LuBaolu/intel-iommu/commits/iommu-dma-ownership-v8 > > with v8 I do not hit the warning anymore and the owner accounting seems > to work as expected. Thank you, Eric! I will post the v8 soon. Best regards, baolu