Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 8 Mar 2022 19:18:39 +0000
From:   Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To:     Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc:     guohanjun@huawei.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org,
        linux@armlinux.org.uk, lenb@kernel.org, robert.moore@intel.com,
        james.morse@arm.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        patches@amperecomputing.com, scott@os.amperecomputing.com,
        darren@os.amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 0/2] ACPI: Arm Generic Diagnostic Dump and
 Reset device
Message-ID: <YiesD0vwbAOQGaGK@lpieralisi>
References: <20220304054003.152319-1-ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
 <YiIsYzGeeYWPQKsp@lpieralisi>
 <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2203071424290.3354@ubuntu200401>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2203071424290.3354@ubuntu200401>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 02:29:10PM -0800, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:

[...]

> > > Would you prefer this version, which doesn't have platform
> > > device/driver any more?
> > 
> > I thought about that and in order to keep consistency it is better to
> > keep the platform device model, so please resend the latest version
> > platform device based and I will ACK it (hopefully it is not too late
> > for v5.18).
> 
> Sure, I can do that. Just one question, do you still prefer agdi_init()
> getting called from acpi_init() or via device_initcall()?

In acpi_init(), thanks.

Lorenzo