Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <845e4589-97d9-5371-3a0e-f6e05919f32d@linux.microsoft.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Mar 2022 10:51:38 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename
 args to unwind()
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc:     broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org,
        nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com, sjitindarsingh@gmail.com,
        catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <95691cae4f4504f33d0fc9075541b1e7deefe96f>
 <20220117145608.6781-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20220117145608.6781-7-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
 <YgutJKqYe8ss8LLd@FVFF77S0Q05N>
From:   "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <YgutJKqYe8ss8LLd@FVFF77S0Q05N>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hey Mark Rutland, Mark Brown,

Could you please review the rest of the patches in the series when you can?

Also, many of the patches have received a Reviewed-By from you both. So, after I send the next version out, can we upstream those ones?

Thanks.

Madhavan

On 2/15/22 07:39, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 08:56:03AM -0600, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote:
>> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
>>
>> Rename the arguments to unwind() for better consistency. Also, use the
>> typedef stack_trace_consume_fn for the consume_entry function as it is
>> already defined in linux/stacktrace.h.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> How about: 
> 
> | arm64: align with common stracktrace naming
> |
> | For historical reasons, the naming of parameters and their types in the arm64
> | stacktrace code differs from that used in generic code and other
> | architectures, even though the types are equivalent.
> |
> | For consistency and clarity, use the generic names.
> 
> Either way:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> 
> Mark.
> 
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
>> index 1b32e55735aa..f772dac78b11 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
>> @@ -181,12 +181,12 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
>>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
>>  
>>  static void notrace unwind(struct unwind_state *state,
>> -			   bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data)
>> +			   stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie)
>>  {
>>  	while (1) {
>>  		int ret;
>>  
>> -		if (!fn(data, state->pc))
>> +		if (!consume_entry(cookie, state->pc))
>>  			break;
>>  		ret = unwind_next(state);
>>  		if (ret < 0)
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>