Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Message-ID: <d687840f-1622-59de-8369-f1a8c090ae46@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 8 Mar 2022 12:49:49 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
        slade@sladewatkins.com
References: <20220307162147.440035361@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20220308185219.GA3686655@roeck-us.net> <YienMYvdhGPCcPSv@kroah.com>
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/184] 5.16.13-rc2 review
In-Reply-To: <YienMYvdhGPCcPSv@kroah.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 3/8/22 10:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:52:19AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 05:28:30PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.13 release.
>>> There are 184 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Mar 2022 16:21:20 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> Your cycles are getting too short for my test system to provide results
>> in time. It gets overwhelmed, especially when there are updates affecting
>> all stable branches which trigger a complete rebuild of all those branches.
> 
> Sorry, but this one had to go out a bit sooner for reasons I don't want
> to speculate about :)
> 

Another one, after the write file issue ? Sigh.
I really hate that the Powers That Be don't tell me about that stuff :-(.

We have severe conflicts against all Chrome OS kernel branches in this series.
I hope that fix was worth it.

> Anyway, I checked your builders, and they all looked ok except the 5.15
> tree, which I know is broken on MIPS right now.
> 
Hmm, sorry, I didn't realize that there was more than one END issue.

Guenter