Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:413:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 19csp3472877pxp; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:21:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzohc7gZgmu4xOd/TLOadhxmSWO+SIQ+eNtMglhvLwevbYJz7aMbQdDtDNHBIl/KwmpFmsH X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f602:b0:14f:53a8:64f7 with SMTP id n2-20020a170902f60200b0014f53a864f7mr19412916plg.151.1646781695069; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 15:21:35 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1646781695; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WD2arqTd+Kdi3xjaOWGpclGCQK70PyNo26b1Q+nlLagQywLQcnCdFT+M+2CxFNCnkR /pbISQwTgoO2BrDWmOcxhGAqZXHqUO1DcPlOL0dr24UtDE/JzoKPo83Nq93TXl38kzuS K00Aav4jiEz8UVAMUE2Ef1ai1InZnVhmjlsaFac1fb4VjbwYRm1lo+p0ZgsJbgjynYyN 9uy72/Vhphe0ys2iSGfUW5ihDUdPY3mcU+b54jjVHT+GFEug3G+q6OX4d6Q40sMrrwI+ QSiaKyVOKN2y6TSb5R8n3E7UG9hlxTt+h5GsjqRrG9RmxA2S9ZXU/9WmaY+esZ7fE7dQ HN0A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=D1x7NWi1v1hBJUBuuGLog/NGjJGXvjepVPYYq3sc2zo=; b=KEr7YbKsJhTs53B0aRrZZLQGCKRsFu7hMarqdMb4J5nt4ZCgXvrhS5U4BqFwbnp4G4 SHKxmJBcpD9WrM+3ylCG41gI+zkBtMCyXZsfyl+zVyLGI0pTg4I70ho0IKWfHDOu5Hpk +SVc2Jxhcloe5QZseJYJxj+03Aar4flYsa9XX47VgU8gTTTi7lgqHAk3dqw9X4F+4k4W V1xEhQsHDqsE66jYMODTbG1YA8QnTUiTEuCTnNvskKaHPlEzVjJ4ynbx+DiCCxjMNiC7 0SIvyrfpSA74CRbcf9/Aum94IHXtMTzm7lRdfqqU90nPDcAJKBKA8DSWTrE1qdorW+O6 syVg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [23.128.96.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c15-20020a170903234f00b00151de413311si329903plh.67.2022.03.08.15.21.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Mar 2022 15:21:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63D1652F5; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:13:45 -0800 (PST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346655AbiCHMA7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 8 Mar 2022 07:00:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33692 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233849AbiCHMAz (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2022 07:00:55 -0500 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de (metis.ext.pengutronix.de [IPv6:2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFDF12AE18 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 03:59:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ptx.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nRYVQ-0007xW-Oe; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 12:59:56 +0100 Received: from ore by ptx.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nRYVP-0001ru-R2; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 12:59:55 +0100 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 12:59:55 +0100 From: Oleksij Rempel To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: Woojung Huh , Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vivien Didelot , kernel@pengutronix.de, Jakub Kicinski , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: implement MTU configuration Message-ID: <20220308115955.GB1086@pengutronix.de> References: <20220224045936.GB4594@pengutronix.de> <20220224093329.hssghouq7hmgxvwb@skbuf> <20220224093827.GC4594@pengutronix.de> <20220224094657.jzhvi67ryhuipor4@skbuf> <20220225114740.GA27407@pengutronix.de> <20220225115802.bvjd54cwwk6hjyfa@skbuf> <20220225125430.GB27407@pengutronix.de> <20220225163543.vnqlkltgmwf4vlmm@skbuf> <20220308100644.GA5189@pengutronix.de> <20220308112156.6s2ssnkhifxuuw2w@skbuf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220308112156.6s2ssnkhifxuuw2w@skbuf> X-Sent-From: Pengutronix Hildesheim X-URL: http://www.pengutronix.de/ X-IRC: #ptxdist @freenode X-Accept-Language: de,en X-Accept-Content-Type: text/plain X-Uptime: 12:42:12 up 87 days, 20:27, 87 users, load average: 0.01, 0.05, 0.13 User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ore@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 01:21:56PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 11:06:44AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > > > > I was saying: > > > > > > > > > > ip link set lan1 up > > > > > ip link add link lan1 name lan1.5 type vlan id 5 > > > > > ip addr add 172.17.0.2/24 dev lan1.5 && ip link set lan1.5 up > > > > > iperf3 -c 172.17.0.10 > > > > > > > > It works. > > > > > > This is akin to saying that without any calls to ksz9477_change_mtu(), > > > just writing VLAN_ETH_FRAME_LEN + ETH_FCS_LEN into REG_SW_MTU__2 is > > > sufficient to get VLAN-tagged MTU-sized packets to pass through the CPU > > > port and the lan1 user port. > > > > > > So my question is: is this necessary? > > > > > > if (dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port)) > > > new_mtu += KSZ9477_INGRESS_TAG_LEN; > > > > > > > No. > > > > I did some extra tests with following results: REG_SW_MTU__2 should be > > configured to 1518 to pass 1514 frame. Independent if the frame is > > passed between external ports or external to CPU port. So, I assume, > > ETH_FRAME_LEN + ETH_FCS_LEN should be used instead of VLAN_ETH_FRAME_LEN > > + ETH_FCS_LEN. Correct? > > Oleksij, to be clear, I only had an issue with consistency. > You were adding KSZ9477_INGRESS_TAG_LEN during ksz9477_change_mtu() but > not during initial setup. That prompted the question: is that particular > member of the sum needed or not? Either it's needed in both places, or > in none. > > Then, apart from removing KSZ9477_INGRESS_TAG_LEN, you've also made an > unsolicited change (subtracted VLAN_HLEN from the value programmed to > hardware) without a clear confirmation that you understand what this > does, and without explicitly saying that the iperf3 test above still > works with this formula applied. > > Since the VLAN header is part of L2, it means that a port configured for > MTU 1500 must also support VLAN-tagged packets with an L2 payload of > 1500 octets. 1500 + ETH_HLEN + VLAN_HLEN == 1518 octets. Ah.. now it solves my brain knot. > And since you need to add ETH_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN, I have an unconfirmed > hunch that VLAN_HLEN is also needed for the case above. Yes, you are right. > So, I'm sorry for being paranoid, but you aren't really giving me a > choice but to ask again, and again. Thank you for being paranoid. Sorry, i'll send new patch. Regards, Oleksij -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |