Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:21:29 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Duc Nguyen <duc.nguyen.ub@renesas.com>,
        Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>,
        "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
        Andrew Gabbasov <andrew_gabbasov@mentor.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Correct QSPI data transfer
 in Manual mode
Message-ID: <YicSCZfl4wLUzvEJ@shikoro>
Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Duc Nguyen <duc.nguyen.ub@renesas.com>,
        Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>,
        "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
        Andrew Gabbasov <andrew_gabbasov@mentor.com>
References: <20210922091007.5516-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
 <163282533892.34438.1878675609177525004.b4-ty@canonical.com>
 <CAMuHMdUqQLo7=NFaNEukqniTJbx-mSZv7eQNB9eCT=L28y3u=A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FPccZbRjvw/M929x"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUqQLo7=NFaNEukqniTJbx-mSZv7eQNB9eCT=L28y3u=A@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk


--FPccZbRjvw/M929x
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline


> Wolfram: which platform did you use for QSPI testing, so I don't
> break that again?

I did my refactoring using an Eagle board and once this worked, I
enabled QSPI on Falcon. All remotely. Condor was another candidate but
it was broken in the lab at that time.

>     Without that (e.g. old H3 R-Car ES1.0), it crashes with an

Frankly, I wouldn't trust ES1.0 as a reliable source for QSPI. Could you
start with the newest Gen3 board you have and then go to previous ones?


--FPccZbRjvw/M929x
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=EP7f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FPccZbRjvw/M929x--